LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for DLF-ANNOUNCE Archives


DLF-ANNOUNCE Archives

DLF-ANNOUNCE Archives


DLF-ANNOUNCE@LISTS.CLIR.ORG


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DLF-ANNOUNCE Home

DLF-ANNOUNCE Home

DLF-ANNOUNCE  December 2004

DLF-ANNOUNCE December 2004

Subject:

One more on Google/Library partnerships -- NYTimes.com Article

From:

David Seaman <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

DLF Digital Library Announcements <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 14 Dec 2004 08:55:24 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (274 lines)



And another article on the big news of the day, forwarded from
Lib-License.

**********

On the front page of the online New York Times this morning; also in the

Chronicle of Higher Education.

\----------------------------------------------------------/


Google Is Adding Major Libraries to Its Database

December 14, 2004
By JOHN MARKOFF and EDWARD WYATT 

Google, the operator of the world's most popular Internet search
service,
plans to announce an agreement today with some of the nation's leading
research libraries and Oxford University to begin converting their
holdings into digital files that would be freely searchable over the
Web.

It may be only a step on a long road toward the long-predicted global
virtual library. But the collaboration of Google and research
institutions
that also include Harvard, the University of Michigan, Stanford and the
New York Public Library is a major stride in an ambitious Internet
effort
by various parties. The goal is to expand the Web beyond its current
valuable, if eclectic, body of material and create a digital card
catalog
and searchable library for the world's books, scholarly papers and
special
collections.

Google - newly wealthy from its stock offering last summer - has agreed
to
underwrite the projects being announced today while also adding its own
technical abilities to the task of scanning and digitizing tens of
thousands of pages a day at each library.

Although Google executives declined to comment on its technology or the
cost of the undertaking, others involved estimate the figure at $10 for
each of the more than 15 million books and other documents covered in
the
agreements. Librarians involved predict the project could take at least
a
decade.

Because the Google agreements are not exclusive, the pacts are almost
certain to touch off a race with other major Internet search providers
like Amazon, Microsoft and Yahoo. Like Google, they might seek the right
to offer online access to library materials in return for selling
advertising, while libraries would receive corporate help in digitizing
their collections for their own institutional uses.

"Within two decades, most of the world's knowledge will be digitized and
available, one hopes for free reading on the Internet, just as there is
free reading in libraries today," said Michael A. Keller, Stanford
University's head librarian.

The Google effort and others like it that are already under way,
including
projects by the Library of Congress to put selections of its best
holdings
online, are part of a trend to potentially democratize access to
information that has long been available to only small, select groups of
students and scholars.

Last night the Library of Congress and a group of international
libraries
from the United States, Canada, Egypt, China and the Netherlands
announced
a plan to create a publicly available digital archive of one million
books
on the Internet. The group said it planned to have 70,000 volumes online
by next April.

"Having the great libraries at your fingertips allows us to build on and
create great works based on the work of others," said Brewster Kahle,
founder and president of the Internet Archive, a San Francisco-based
digital library that is also trying to digitize existing print
information.

The agreements to be announced today will allow Google to publish the
full
text of only those library books old enough to no longer be under
copyright. For copyrighted works, Google would scan in the entire text,
but make only short excerpts available online.

Each agreement with a library is slightly different. Google plans to
digitize nearly all the eight million books in Stanford's collection and
the seven million at Michigan. The Harvard project will initially be
limited to only about 40,000 volumes. The scanning at Bodleian Library
at
Oxford will be limited to an unspecified number of books published
before
1900, while the New York Public Library project will involve fragile
material not under copyright that library officials said would be of
interest primarily to scholars.

The trend toward online libraries and virtual card catalogs is one that
already has book publishers scrambling to respond.

At least a dozen major publishing companies, including some of the
country's biggest producers of nonfiction books - the primary target for
the online text-search efforts - have already entered ventures with
Google
and Amazon that allow users to search the text of copyrighted books
online
and read excerpts.

Publishers including HarperCollins, the Penguin Group, Houghton Mifflin
and Scholastic have signed up for both the Google and Amazon programs.
The
largest American trade publisher, Random House, participates in Amazon's
program but is still negotiating with Google, which calls its program
Google Print.

The Amazon and Google programs work by restricting the access of users
to
only a few pages of a copyrighted book during each search, offering
enough
to help them decide whether the book meets their requirements enough to
justify ordering the print version. Those features restrict a user's
ability to copy, cut or print the copyrighted material, while limiting
on-screen reading to a few pages at a time. Books still under copyright
at
the libraries involved in Google's new project are likely to be
protected
by similar restrictions.

The challenge for publishers in coming years will be to continue to have
libraries serve as major influential buyers of their books, without
letting the newly vast digital public reading rooms undermine the
companies' ability to make money commissioning and publishing authors'
work.

From the earliest days of the printing press, book publishers were wary
of
the development of libraries at all. In many instances, they opposed the
idea of a central facility offering free access to books that people
would
otherwise be compelled to buy.

But as libraries developed and publishers became aware that they could
be
among their best customers, that opposition faded. Now publishers
aggressively court librarians with advance copies of books, seeking
positive reviews of books in library journals and otherwise trying to
influence the opinion of the people who influence the reading habits of
millions. Some of that promotional impulse may translate to the online
world, publishing executives say.

But at least initially, the search services are likely to be most useful
to publishers whose nonfiction backlists, or catalogs of previously
published titles, are of interest to scholars but do not sell regularly
enough to be carried in large quantities in retail stores, said David
Steinberger, the president and chief executive the Perseus Books Group,
which publishes mostly nonfiction books under the Basic Books,
PublicAffairs, Da Capo and other imprints.

Based on his experiences with Amazon's and Google's commercial search
services so far, Mr. Steinberger said, "I think there is minimal risk,
or
virtually no risk, of copyrighted material being misused." But he said
he
would object to a library's providing copyrighted material online
without
a license. "If you're talking about the instantaneous, free distribution
of books, I think that would represent a problem," Mr. Steinberger said.

For their part, libraries themselves will have to rethink their central
missions as storehouses of printed, indexed material.

"Our world is about to change in a big, big way," said Daniel
Greenstein,
university librarian for the California Digital Library of the
University
of California, which is a project to organize and retain existing
digital
materials.

Instead of expending considerable time and money to managing their
collections of printed materials, Mr. Greenstein said, libraries in the
future can devote more energy to gathering information and making it
accessible - and more easily manageable - online.

But Paul LeClerc, the president and chief executive of the New York
Public
Library, sees Web access as an expansion of libraries' reach, not a
replacement for physical collections. "Librarians will add a new
dimension
to their work," Mr. LeClerc said. "They will not abandon their mission
of
collecting printed material and keeping them for decades and even
centuries."

Google's founders, Sergey Brin and Larry Page, have long vowed to make
all
of the world's information accessible to anyone with a Web browser. The
agreements to be announced today will put them a few steps closer to
that
goal - at least in terms of the English-language portion of the world's
information. Mr. Page said yesterday that the project traced to the
roots
of Google, which he and Mr. Brin founded in 1998 after taking a leave
from
a graduate computer science program at Stanford where they worked on a
"digital libraries" project. "What we first discussed at Stanford is now
becoming practical," Mr. Page said.

At Stanford, Google hopes to be able to scan 50,000 pages a day within
the
month, eventually doubling that rate, according to a person involved in
the project.

The Google plan calls for making the library materials available as part
of Google's regular Web service, which currently has an estimated eight
billion Web pages in its database and tens of millions of users a day.
As
with the other information on its service, Google will sell advertising
to
generate revenue from its library material. (In it existing Google Print
program, the company shares advertising revenue with the participating
book publishers.)

Each library, meanwhile, will receive its own copy of the digital
database
created from that institution's holdings, which the library can make
available through its own Web site if it chooses.

Harvard officials said they would be happy to use the Internet to share
their collections widely. "We have always thought of our libraries at
Harvard as being a global resource," said Lawrence H. Summers, president
of Harvard.

At least initially, Google's digitizing task will be labor intensive,
with
people placing the books and documents on sophisticated scanners whose
high-resolution cameras capture an image of each page and convert it to
a
digital file.

Google, whose corporate campus in Mountain View, Calif., is just a few
miles from Stanford, plans to transport books to a copying center it has
established at its headquarters. There the books will be scanned and
then
returned to the Stanford libraries. Google plans to set up remote
scanning
operations at both Michigan and Harvard.

The company refused to comment on the technology that it was using to
digitize books, except to say that it was nondestructive. But according
to
a person who has been briefed on the project, Google's technology is
more
labor-intensive than systems that are already commercially available.

Two small start-up companies, 4DigitalBooks of St. Aubin, Switzerland,
and
Kirtas Technologies of Victor, N.Y., are selling systems that
automatically turn pages to capture images.


http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/14/technology/14google.html?ex=1104027331
&ei=1&en=6f3b91eaacb4a50c 
____

Copyright 2004 The New York Times Company

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
October 2002
August 2002
July 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTS.CLIR.ORG

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager