Putting it on a wiki anyone can edit makes it, perhaps, somewhat more
likely that it ends up maintained longer, making it easier for other
people to get involved in maintaining it without technological barriers
or proprietary feelings getting in the way.
Eric Lease Morgan wrote:
> On Dec 21, 2009, at 2:59 PM, John Fereira wrote:
>> Any thoughts on making this list something more dynamic, web 2.0ish?...
> There certainly seems to be a demand for a more up-to-date list of library-related open source software, and as alluded to previously, such a thing has been attempted a number of times. Creating and maintaining such a list for the long haul -- no matter what technology is used -- would have to be a labor of love.