Abbie,
Thanks for writing the draft proposal based on Kristine's suggestions.  I think it looks good.  I see no need for a programmer/designer either, so agree on that point.  What is our deadline for getting the proposal submitted, or in other words, when do people need to get any comments to you?

Cathy

-----Original Message-----
From: The NDSA Content working group list [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Grotke, Abigail
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 3:39 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [NDSA-CONTENT] Planning for CWG at the NDIIPP/NDSA meeting in July - ideas needed!

This is great, Kristine - and it looks from the poll that we have enough of a core group that will be at the July meeting to do a workshop. 

So, to get this into something that I can pass off, how does this sound? (for the others, some of this came from addition ideas that Kristine offered offlist):

----------------------

--Basic Idea:
The NDSA Content Working proposes a workshop on the selection and categorizing of "at risk" content. Clearinghouse Action Team (Group B) has already done some good work in identifying some of the content groups; we will bring that list as a starting point for discussion. The output of this working group 
will be a concrete list, prioritized, for "at risk" categories that NSDA will focus on -  with the beginnings of an action plan and next steps, including identifying people/institutions to do follow tasks.

--Resources Needed (do we need a programmer or designer to help?): 
None. [correct?]

--Time Needed:
90 minutes

------------------------

Abbie

-----Original Message-----
From: The NDSA Content working group list [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Kristine Hanna
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 2:20 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [NDSA-CONTENT] Planning for CWG at the NDIIPP/NDSA meeting in July - ideas needed!

Hi Abbie, as we discussed earlier today it would be great to have a workshop for the Content working group on the selection and categorizing of "at risk" content.

Clearinghouse Action Team (Group B) has already done some good work in identifying some of the content groups; so perhaps we could bring that list as a starting point and have a 90 minute workshop.

Kristine

Kristine Hanna
Director, Archiving Services
Internet Archive
415 561 6799 x5
[log in to unmask]




On Mar 31, 2011, at 6:35 AM, Grotke, Abigail wrote:

> Hi all:
> LC is beginning to plan the summer NDIIPP/NDSA meeting July 19-21. Looks like it's shaking out to be something like:
> 
> 1 day open session (with "big name" speakers)
> 1 1/2 day NDSA meeting (open to NDSA members and possible other 
> invited folks)
> 
> There is talk of having the various working groups "host" a workshop during the NDSA meeting days. These will vary in length depending on the needs of the group (anywhere from 90 min. to 3 hrs. or whatever). The workshops will be not limited to the particular WG members - so, CWG could host a session and anyone could come from the NDSA. There will likely be some concurrent sessions (for instance, Content and Innovation could be going on at the same time).
> 
> The idea is that during these workshops something will be created, something concrete. Maybe it is requirements, or wireframes, or design or something, or some slogans for the ndsa, whatever we want.
> 
> The working groups are being asked to come up with one or two proposals for what these workshops might cover, by the week of April 18th.
> 
> We'll talk about this on the call next week, but I wanted to get this to you sooner and hopefully start a discussion on the list about what we might do, as the Content WG, in July. 
> 
> Just to seed the discussion, one idea came to mind about related to our Group A work:
> http://www.loc.gov/extranet/wiki/osi/ndiip/ndsa/index.php?title=Tentat
> ive_Work_Plan_for_Content_Registry
> We might be at a stage by July to work in person on some element of this step: 
> "Review the various registries and list out the best features and/or project metadata, then investigate options for creating our own registry." Maybe we could propose a session to determine what fields of data we want our registry to include, and to start designing what the registry input methods or process looks like, or what public access might look like? 
> 
> We'll need to provide back to the meeting coordinators:
> --Basic idea
> --Resources needed (do we need a programmer or designer to help?) 
> --How much time we think we need
> 
> Let's brainstorm!
> 
> Abbie
> 
> ############################
> 
> To unsubscribe from the NDSA-CONTENT list:
> write to: 
> mailto:[log in to unmask]
> or click the following link:
> http://list.digitalpreservation.gov/SCRIPTS/WA-DIGITAL.EXE?SUBED1=NDSA
> -CONTENT&A=1


############################

To unsubscribe from the NDSA-CONTENT list:
write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
or click the following link:
http://list.digitalpreservation.gov/SCRIPTS/WA-DIGITAL.EXE?SUBED1=NDSA-CONTENT&A=1

############################

To unsubscribe from the NDSA-CONTENT list:
write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
or click the following link:
http://list.digitalpreservation.gov/SCRIPTS/WA-DIGITAL.EXE?SUBED1=NDSA-CONTENT&A=1

############################

To unsubscribe from the NDSA-CONTENT list:
write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
or click the following link:
http://list.digitalpreservation.gov/SCRIPTS/WA-DIGITAL.EXE?SUBED1=NDSA-CONTENT&A=1