I agree that we should have explanatory notes or definitions for some of the
fields, including Collection Location.  I also wonder about Subject -- will
this be totally free form or based on an authoritative list or at least a
list of broad categories?  Recollection seems to allow for a lot of
flexibility, but I think for the registry to be useful we must pay attention
to the subject categories we assign.

Thanks for the work on this.  Looking forward to hearing more in DC.


*********************************
Margaret K. Maes
Executive Director
Legal Information Preservation Alliance
P. O. Box 5266
Bloomington, IN  47407
Phone: 812-822-2773
mailto:[log in to unmask]
*********************************



On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 2:11 PM, John L Faundeen <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> All,
>
> Regarding the fields, some collections may not have a URL related to them.
>  Also, the "Collections Location" field is fine as long as we explain,
> like the parenthesis () do, that this field is not seeking where the
> collection currently is housed which is what the field first implied to
> me.  Lastly, the "Collection Availability" seems to include both how ones
> gets to the collection and if there are any restrictions involved. Those
> are two, potentially different, items.  The field works as long as we
> understand it carries a dual meaning.
>
> John Faundeen, Archivist
> U.S. Geological Survey
> Earth Resources Observation and Science Center
> 47914-252nd Street
> Sioux Falls, SD 57198 USA
> Tel: 605-594-6092/Fax: [log in to unmask]
>             https://profile.usgs.gov/faundeen
> ~Records Management - The systematic control of records throughout their
> lifecycle...ARMA.~
>
>
>
> From:
> "Cornwall, Daniel D (EED)" <[log in to unmask]>
> To:
> [log in to unmask]
> Date:
> 07/06/2011 11:53 AM
> Subject:
> [NDSA-CONTENT] Please comment or respond by 7/22: Content Registry Fields
> Sent by:
> The NDSA Content working group list
> <[log in to unmask]>
>
>
>
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> After this morning's meeting I posted a cleaned up version of our
> proposed Recollection fields to
> http://www.loc.gov/extranet/wiki/osi/ndiip/ndsa/index.php?title=Content_
> Registry_Fields.
>
>
>
> Our action team invites your comments either on the wiki, in reply to
> this e-mail or direct comments to [log in to unmask] Bering in
> mind some of us will be extra busy in DC next week, we're taking
> comments through July 22, 2011. Then I'll assemble the feedback into an
> alliance wide survey to be sent out 7/25 or 7/26. I'll be out of the
> office 7/27-8/5. - Daniel
>
>
>
> =======================================
>
> Daniel Cornwall
>
> Head of Technical and Imaging Services
>
> Division of Libraries, Archives and Museums
>
> PO Box 110571
> Juneau, AK 99811-0571
> Phone (907) 465-6332
>
> Fax (907) 465-2665
> E-Mail: [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>
> Web: http://lam.alaska.gov <http://lam.alaska.gov/> .
>
> NOTE: I first check e-mail at 9:30am. If you need to reach me before
> then, please call.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ############################
>
> To unsubscribe from the NDSA-CONTENT list:
> write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
> or click the following link:
>
> http://list.digitalpreservation.gov/SCRIPTS/WA-DIGITAL.EXE?SUBED1=NDSA-CONTENT&A=1
>
> [attachment "image001.gif" deleted by John L Faundeen/GEOG/USGS/DOI]
>
>
> ############################
>
> To unsubscribe from the NDSA-CONTENT list:
> write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
> or click the following link:
>
> http://list.digitalpreservation.gov/SCRIPTS/WA-DIGITAL.EXE?SUBED1=NDSA-CONTENT&A=1
>

############################

To unsubscribe from the NDSA-CONTENT list:
write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
or click the following link:
http://list.digitalpreservation.gov/SCRIPTS/WA-DIGITAL.EXE?SUBED1=NDSA-CONTENT&A=1