And, for myself, I could see participating in the Government group (we're 
not actually part of the government, but it seems closest to what we do). 
I wonder if anyone else would be interested in adding a Business & 
Economics group.  That might be dividing up the content into portions that 
are too small, though.  Otherwise, I'd probably also consider Social 
Sciences.

thanks

Katrina

Katrina Stierholz
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
P.O. Box 442
St. Louis MO  63166
314-444-8552 
[log in to unmask]
http://research.stlouisfed.org





From:   "McAninch, Glen (KDLA)" <[log in to unmask]>
To:     [log in to unmask]
Date:   01/19/2012 02:40 PM
Subject:        Re: [NDSA-CONTENT] Content Teams
Sent by:        The NDSA Content working group list 
<[log in to unmask]>



I think the groups are ok, although somewhat over lapping.  I assume
that Government  team would include local, state and federal
institutions and this is a group I would like to serve on because I have
commonality with preservation activities at all three levels.  Like most
who work in government institutions, I would also be interested in a
subject group beyond my institutional affiliation. Since I was involved
in a four year GIS archiving project I would be interested in working on
the "Maps and Geography team", which I assume would cover geospatial
records. There was also interest in this topic by other archivists and
librarians in three other states directly involved in the NDIIPP grant
and many more of our informational partners. This team could be a  forum
for maintaining the grant activity momentum.

-----Original Message-----
From: The NDSA Content working group list
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Grotke,
Abigail
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 2:19 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [NDSA-CONTENT] Content Teams

In our email yesterday about our plan for 2012 (Text of the email is
here, in case you missed it:
http://www.loc.gov/extranet/wiki/osi/ndiip/ndsa/index.php?title=Plan_for
_2012 ) , we talked about the formation of Content Teams. What do you
all think of these proposed groupings?


Government

Politics and Law

Maps and Geography

News, Media, and Journalism

Science

Mathematics and Technology

Social Sciences

World History and Cultures

American History

Arts and Culture

Religion and Philosophy

If you had to sign up for one (well, you will be asked to sign up for
one as a member of the Content Working Group) - do you see your
organization's content representated? Are these good groupings for us to
have? Should we have fewer groups, more? Others? What content do you
care about preserving?

Don't worry. I'll keep emailing the list until someone, anyone
responds... :)

Abbie

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Abbie Grotke | Web Archiving Team Lead | Office of Strategic Initiatives
National Digital Information and Infrastructure Preservation Program |
Library of Congress http://www.loc.gov/webarchiving/ |
http://www.digitalpreservation.gov<http://www.digitalpreservation.gov/>
202-707-2833 | [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]> | @agrotke


############################

To unsubscribe from the NDSA-CONTENT list:
write to:
mailto:[log in to unmask]
or click the following link:
http://list.digitalpreservation.gov/SCRIPTS/WA-DIGITAL.EXE?SUBED1=NDSA-C
ONTENT&A=1

############################

To unsubscribe from the NDSA-CONTENT list:
write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
or click the following link:
http://list.digitalpreservation.gov/SCRIPTS/WA-DIGITAL.EXE?SUBED1=NDSA-CONTENT&A=1




############################

To unsubscribe from the NDSA-CONTENT list:
write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
or click the following link:
http://list.digitalpreservation.gov/SCRIPTS/WA-DIGITAL.EXE?SUBED1=NDSA-CONTENT&A=1