|
|
Please add me to 8 - social sciences, since much of my data recovery work
involves census and related materials.
Also interested in 6 - Science since that can relate to my CODATA/DARTG work.
Is it OK to join others just 'cause you love the topic? If so, I'd enjoy being
in both History teams 9 and 10.
Best Regards,
Chris Muller
Muller Media Conversions
21 Locust Street
Manhasset NY 11030-2233
www.mullermedia.com
516-833-3067, ext 1-101
>>> "Grotke, Abigail" <[log in to unmask]> 1/23/2012 11:50 AM >>>
Thanks, Ben. I've made a few more edits to the groups based on emails from last
week. Here's our current list and how many members have expressed interest so
far:
1 Government - 5
2 Business and Economics (maybe?) - 1
3 Politics and Law - 0
4 Maps and Geography (or Geospatial?) - 4
5 News, Media, and Journalism - 1
6 Science [and Medicine, or Science, Technology and Medicine?] - 2
7 Mathematics and Technology - (should we combine with Science & Medicine?)
- 0
8 Social Sciences - 4
9 World History and Cultures - 0
10 American History -4
11 Arts & Humanities (includes literature, culture) - 2
12 Religion and Philosophy - 0
We could use some other members chiming in and signing up! Feel free to email me
or sign up via the wiki!
http://www.loc.gov/extranet/wiki/osi/ndiip/ndsa/index.php?title=Content_teams
-----Original Message-----
From: The NDSA Content working group list
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ben Fino-Radin
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 10:52 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [NDSA-CONTENT] Content Teams
I've added Rhizome to the Arts & Culture section.
Literature with Arts & Culture seems to be the logical fit. Perhaps "Arts &
Humanities" is a more apt category.
--
Ben Fino-Radin
Digital Conservator
Rhizome at the New Museum
235 Bowery New York, NY 10002
[log in to unmask]
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Wurl, Joel <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> I would second (third?) that idea. When we form our grant review
> panels here, we typically cluster together applications dealing with
> the history of science, technology, and medicine. There's
> considerable diversity within that configuration, but I think that, in
> general, the number of groups/domains for this working group activity
> would best be kept at a manageable number. I did have a question on
> where "literature" might fit
> -- arts & culture, perhaps?
> Joel
>
> Joel Wurl
> Sr. Program Officer
> Division of Preservation & Access
> National Endowment for the Humanities
> 1100 Pennsylvania Ave. NW
> Washington, DC 20506
> phone: 202-606-8252 fax: 202-606-8639
> email: [log in to unmask]
> Visit the NEH Website at www.neh.gov
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: The NDSA Content working group list [mailto:
> [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of John L
> Faundeen
> Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 9:00 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [NDSA-CONTENT] Content Teams
>
> Building on Christie's comments below, I have often seen Science,
> Technology & Medicine combined. The categories will always have some
> challenges such as is a map also a science record and if created by a
> government entity.....We can only work to define what we mean by these
> categories and realize overlap will occur.
>
> John Faundeen, Archivist
> U.S. Geological Survey
> Earth Resources Observation and Science Center 47914-252nd Street
> Sioux Falls, SD 57198 USA
> Tel: 605-594-6092/Fax: [log in to unmask]
> https://profile.usgs.gov/faundeen ~Records Management -
> The systematic control of records throughout their lifecycle...ARMA.~
>
>
>
> From:
> "Moffatt, Christie (NIH/NLM) [E]" <[log in to unmask]>
> To:
> [log in to unmask]
> Date:
> 01/20/2012 07:38 AM
> Subject:
> Re: [NDSA-CONTENT] Content Teams
> Sent by:
> The NDSA Content working group list
> <[log in to unmask]>
>
>
>
> Forming smaller groups along these lines sounds like a good plan to
> me, too. I am interested in the Science category, and would be in
> favor of broadening that topic to include Medicine.
>
> In thinking about your question on the desired granularity of our "at
> risk" nominations, it seems as though starting with the identification
> of content at a broader level then working toward object level might
> make sense. We would then benefit from having a deeper understanding
> of the types of content that are at risk as well as specific
> collections or groups of material.
>
> Christie
>
>
> Christie Moffatt
> Digital Manuscripts Program
> History of Medicine Division
> National Library of Medicine
> Building 38, Room 1E-21
> 8600 Rockville Pike
> Bethesda, MD 20894
> Phone: 301-496-9136
> Fax: 301-402-7034
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Grotke, Abigail [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 2:19 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [NDSA-CONTENT] Content Teams
>
> In our email yesterday about our plan for 2012 (Text of the email is
> here, in case you missed it:
>
> http://www.loc.gov/extranet/wiki/osi/ndiip/ndsa/index.php?title=Plan_f
> or_2012
> ) , we talked about the formation of Content Teams. What do you all
> think of these proposed groupings?
>
>
> Government
>
> Politics and Law
>
> Maps and Geography
>
> News, Media, and Journalism
>
> Science
>
> Mathematics and Technology
>
> Social Sciences
>
> World History and Cultures
>
> American History
>
> Arts and Culture
>
> Religion and Philosophy
>
> If you had to sign up for one (well, you will be asked to sign up for
> one as a member of the Content Working Group) - do you see your
> organization's content representated? Are these good groupings for us
> to have? Should we have fewer groups, more? Others? What content do
> you care about preserving?
>
> Don't worry. I'll keep emailing the list until someone, anyone responds...
> :)
>
> Abbie
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Abbie Grotke | Web Archiving Team Lead | Office of Strategic
> Initiatives National Digital Information and Infrastructure
> Preservation Program | Library of Congress
> http://www.loc.gov/webarchiving/ |
> http://www.digitalpreservation.gov<http://www.digitalpreservation.gov/
> >
> 202-707-2833 | [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]> | @agrotke
>
>
> ############################
>
> To unsubscribe from the NDSA-CONTENT list:
> write to:
> mailto:[log in to unmask]
> or click the following link:
>
> http://list.digitalpreservation.gov/SCRIPTS/WA-DIGITAL.EXE?SUBED1=NDSA
> -CONTENT&A=1
>
>
> ############################
>
> To unsubscribe from the NDSA-CONTENT list:
> write to:
> mailto:[log in to unmask]
> or click the following link:
>
> http://list.digitalpreservation.gov/SCRIPTS/WA-DIGITAL.EXE?SUBED1=NDSA
> -CONTENT&A=1
>
>
>
>
> ############################
>
> To unsubscribe from the NDSA-CONTENT list:
> write to:
> mailto:[log in to unmask]
> or click the following link:
>
> http://list.digitalpreservation.gov/SCRIPTS/WA-DIGITAL.EXE?SUBED1=NDSA
> -CONTENT&A=1
>
> ############################
>
> To unsubscribe from the NDSA-CONTENT list:
> write to:
> mailto:[log in to unmask]
> or click the following link:
>
> http://list.digitalpreservation.gov/SCRIPTS/WA-DIGITAL.EXE?SUBED1=NDSA
> -CONTENT&A=1
>
############################
To unsubscribe from the NDSA-CONTENT list:
write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
or click the following link:
http://list.digitalpreservation.gov/SCRIPTS/WA-DIGITAL.EXE?SUBED1=NDSA-CONTENT&A
=1
############################
To unsubscribe from the NDSA-CONTENT list:
write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
or click the following link:
http://list.digitalpreservation.gov/SCRIPTS/WA-DIGITAL.EXE?SUBED1=NDSA-CONTENT&A
=1
############################
To unsubscribe from the NDSA-CONTENT list:
write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
or click the following link:
http://list.digitalpreservation.gov/SCRIPTS/WA-DIGITAL.EXE?SUBED1=NDSA-CONTENT&A
=1
############################
To unsubscribe from the NDSA-CONTENT list:
write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
or click the following link:
http://list.digitalpreservation.gov/SCRIPTS/WA-DIGITAL.EXE?SUBED1=NDSA-CONTENT&A
=1
############################
To unsubscribe from the NDSA-CONTENT list:
write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
or click the following link:
http://list.digitalpreservation.gov/SCRIPTS/WA-DIGITAL.EXE?SUBED1=NDSA-CONTENT&A
=1
############################
To unsubscribe from the NDSA-CONTENT list:
write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
or click the following link:
http://list.digitalpreservation.gov/SCRIPTS/WA-DIGITAL.EXE?SUBED1=NDSA-CONTENT&A=1
|
|
|
|
|
Archives |
July 2022 May 2022 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 September 2020 June 2020 February 2019 May 2018 March 2018 February 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014, Week 2 March 2014, Week 1 March 2014 February 2014, Week 4 February 2014, Week 2 February 2014, Week 1 January 2014, Week 4 January 2014, Week 3 January 2014, Week 2 January 2014, Week 1 December 2013, Week 1 November 2013, Week 2 November 2013, Week 1 October 2013, Week 5 October 2013, Week 3 October 2013, Week 2 September 2013, Week 5 September 2013, Week 4 September 2013, Week 3 August 2013, Week 5 August 2013, Week 4 August 2013, Week 3 August 2013, Week 2 August 2013, Week 1 July 2013, Week 5 July 2013, Week 4 July 2013, Week 3 July 2013, Week 2 July 2013, Week 1 June 2013, Week 3 June 2013, Week 2 June 2013, Week 1 May 2013, Week 4 May 2013, Week 3 May 2013, Week 2 May 2013, Week 1 April 2013, Week 5 April 2013, Week 4 April 2013, Week 3 April 2013, Week 2 April 2013, Week 1 March 2013, Week 5 March 2013, Week 2 March 2013, Week 1 February 2013, Week 3 February 2013, Week 2 January 2013, Week 5 January 2013, Week 4 January 2013, Week 3 January 2013, Week 2 December 2012, Week 1 November 2012, Week 5 November 2012, Week 3 November 2012, Week 2 November 2012, Week 1 October 2012, Week 5 October 2012, Week 4 October 2012, Week 1 September 2012, Week 3 September 2012, Week 2 September 2012, Week 1 August 2012, Week 5 August 2012, Week 4 August 2012, Week 2 August 2012, Week 1 July 2012, Week 5 July 2012, Week 3 July 2012, Week 1 June 2012, Week 3 June 2012, Week 2 June 2012, Week 1 May 2012, Week 2 May 2012, Week 1 April 2012, Week 4 April 2012, Week 3 April 2012, Week 2 April 2012, Week 1 March 2012, Week 4 March 2012, Week 3 March 2012, Week 2 March 2012, Week 1 February 2012, Week 2 February 2012, Week 1 January 2012, Week 5 January 2012, Week 4 January 2012, Week 3 January 2012, Week 2 January 2012, Week 1 December 2011, Week 5 December 2011, Week 3 December 2011, Week 2 December 2011, Week 1 November 2011, Week 3 November 2011, Week 1 October 2011, Week 5 October 2011, Week 3 October 2011, Week 2 October 2011, Week 1 September 2011, Week 5 September 2011, Week 4 September 2011, Week 3 September 2011, Week 2 September 2011, Week 1 August 2011, Week 4 August 2011, Week 3 August 2011, Week 1 July 2011, Week 4 July 2011, Week 3 July 2011, Week 2 July 2011, Week 1 June 2011, Week 4 June 2011, Week 2 June 2011, Week 1 May 2011, Week 5 May 2011, Week 1 April 2011, Week 4 April 2011, Week 3 April 2011, Week 2 April 2011, Week 1 March 2011, Week 5 March 2011, Week 1 February 2011, Week 2 February 2011, Week 1 January 2011, Week 3 January 2011, Week 2 January 2011, Week 1 December 2010, Week 3 December 2010, Week 2 December 2010, Week 1 November 2010, Week 3 November 2010, Week 2 November 2010, Week 1 October 2010, Week 5 October 2010, Week 4 October 2010, Week 2 September 2010, Week 4 September 2010, Week 3 September 2010, Week 2 September 2010, Week 1 August 2010, Week 5
|
|