LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for NDSA-STANDARDS Archives


NDSA-STANDARDS Archives

NDSA-STANDARDS Archives


NDSA-STANDARDS@LISTS.CLIR.ORG


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

NDSA-STANDARDS Home

NDSA-STANDARDS Home

NDSA-STANDARDS  May 2012, Week 3

NDSA-STANDARDS May 2012, Week 3

Subject:

Re: please review revised version of the staffing survey

From:

Stephen Paul Davis <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

The NDSA Standards working group list <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 21 May 2012 17:36:19 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (90 lines)

Andrea and all:   Survey is looking good.   I would like to strongly 
recommend that we also make a full copy of the survey available up front 
for download by those being asked to answer the actual survey --  
especially if you can't page through the entire survey without answering 
required questions.    At Columbia these surveys go through several 
steps:  based on a review of the survey content, we decide who should 
respond; then, looking at the questions, we determine who actually has 
the requested information or who will be asked to research it if needed. 
   We then use the printout or PDF of the survey as a worksheet before 
actually completing the online version.   Sometimes we even circulate 
the draft answers for senior manager review, depending on the nature and 
importance of the survey.

It would also be great if we could retain a record of how we answered 
the survey.  (Does SurveyMonkey have that type of feature, i.e., 
enabling a copy of the completed survey to be downloaded or printed?)

It helps with uptake to make the questions available in advance, and it 
makes us survey answerers' lives easier ;}

/Stephen

PS: Sorry I missed the last group call.

On 5/21/2012 3:43 PM, Jones, Jimi wrote:
> Thank you Andrea! I gave the first page a glance and it's looking good. I'm going to sit down and go through the survey more thoroughly, line-by-line. I have a quick question though - will the survey software allow us to put the NDSA logo and/or the Standards group logo on the survey? Both can be found here: http://www.digitalpreservation.gov/ndsa/
>
> It would be good to at least put the NDSA logo on the first page with a link to the NDSA main page, if it's not on the survey somewhere already.
>
> Excellent work, thank you!
>
> Jimi
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: The NDSA Standards working group list [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Goethals, Andrea
> Sent: Monday, May 21, 2012 2:13 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [NDSA-STANDARDS] please review revised version of the staffing survey
>
> Hello,
>
> I made some revisions to the dp staffing survey based on:
> - feedback from our last WG call (defines FTE, gives example of other department, ability to indicate that an area isn't considered part of the dp function)
> -  feedback from Mary Vardigan via email (primarily about the privacy text, but also some new options for the type of organization, and the wording of the question about the amount of files being preserved)
> - best practice videos/manuals on building surveys (by Qualtrics and SurveyMonkey) Based on these I simplified how the number ranges were presented for the question on amount of content, simplified some question text, and added some more N/A and Other options.
> - capability of Qualtrics - using a feature called "carry forward choices", they're now asked which areas are considered part of the dp function at their org, and in a follow up question they are asked the status of any they had selected in the previous question.
>
> You can try out a test version of the survey with this link:  Try the test version of the survey.<https://harvard.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_7PdihNMVB9FnT6I>
> Currently 2 of the questions are required (name of organization, type of organization) so you won't be able to advance to page 2 if you leave these blank.
>
> Any and all feedback is welcome.
>
> For the "real" survey, Jimi and I were thinking that a month should be sufficient time to keep the survey open once we're ready to publish it. That should give us enough time to look at the number of responses coming in and send out reminders if needed. Any objections to the month length?
>
> Thanks,
> Andrea
>
> Andrea Goethals
> Digital Preservation and Repository Services Manager Harvard Library [log in to unmask]
> (617) 495-3724
>
>
> ############################
>
> To unsubscribe from the NDSA-STANDARDS list:
> write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
> or click the following link:
> http://list.digitalpreservation.gov/SCRIPTS/WA-DIGITAL.EXE?SUBED1=NDSA-STANDARDS&A=1
>
> ############################
>
> To unsubscribe from the NDSA-STANDARDS list:
> write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
> or click the following link:
> http://list.digitalpreservation.gov/SCRIPTS/WA-DIGITAL.EXE?SUBED1=NDSA-STANDARDS&A=1
>


-- 
Stephen Paul Davis, Director
Digital Program Division
Columbia University Libraries
[log in to unmask] - (212) 854-8584

############################

To unsubscribe from the NDSA-STANDARDS list:
write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
or click the following link:
http://list.digitalpreservation.gov/SCRIPTS/WA-DIGITAL.EXE?SUBED1=NDSA-STANDARDS&A=1

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

September 2024
July 2024
June 2024
March 2024
January 2024
December 2023
October 2023
July 2023
June 2023
October 2022
July 2022
April 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
July 2021
June 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
September 2020
August 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
July 2019
May 2019
March 2019
October 2018
May 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014, Week 3
March 2014, Week 2
March 2014, Week 1
March 2014
February 2014, Week 4
February 2014, Week 3
February 2014, Week 2
February 2014, Week 1
January 2014, Week 4
January 2014, Week 1
December 2013, Week 3
December 2013, Week 2
December 2013, Week 1
November 2013, Week 3
November 2013, Week 2
November 2013, Week 1
October 2013, Week 5
October 2013, Week 3
September 2013, Week 3
September 2013, Week 2
August 2013, Week 5
August 2013, Week 2
August 2013, Week 1
July 2013, Week 3
July 2013, Week 2
July 2013, Week 1
June 2013, Week 4
June 2013, Week 2
May 2013, Week 4
May 2013, Week 3
April 2013, Week 4
April 2013, Week 1
March 2013, Week 4
March 2013, Week 3
March 2013, Week 2
February 2013, Week 4
February 2013, Week 2
January 2013, Week 5
January 2013, Week 4
January 2013, Week 3
January 2013, Week 2
December 2012, Week 3
December 2012, Week 2
December 2012, Week 1
November 2012, Week 5
November 2012, Week 4
November 2012, Week 3
November 2012, Week 2
October 2012, Week 5
October 2012, Week 4
October 2012, Week 1
September 2012, Week 4
September 2012, Week 3
September 2012, Week 2
September 2012, Week 1
August 2012, Week 5
August 2012, Week 3
August 2012, Week 2
August 2012, Week 1
July 2012, Week 5
July 2012, Week 4
July 2012, Week 3
June 2012, Week 3
June 2012, Week 2
May 2012, Week 5
May 2012, Week 4
May 2012, Week 3
May 2012, Week 2
May 2012, Week 1
April 2012, Week 4
April 2012, Week 3
April 2012, Week 2
April 2012, Week 1
March 2012, Week 5
March 2012, Week 3
March 2012, Week 2
March 2012, Week 1
February 2012, Week 4
February 2012, Week 3
February 2012, Week 1
January 2012, Week 5
January 2012, Week 3
January 2012, Week 2
January 2012, Week 1
December 2011, Week 5
December 2011, Week 4
December 2011, Week 3
December 2011, Week 2
December 2011, Week 1
November 2011, Week 5
November 2011, Week 3
November 2011, Week 2
November 2011, Week 1
October 2011, Week 4
October 2011, Week 3
October 2011, Week 1
September 2011, Week 4
September 2011, Week 3
September 2011, Week 2
September 2011, Week 1
August 2011, Week 2
August 2011, Week 1
July 2011, Week 4
July 2011, Week 2
July 2011, Week 1
June 2011, Week 3
June 2011, Week 2
June 2011, Week 1
May 2011, Week 1
April 2011, Week 4
April 2011, Week 1
March 2011, Week 5
March 2011, Week 4
March 2011, Week 2
March 2011, Week 1
February 2011, Week 4
February 2011, Week 2
February 2011, Week 1
January 2011, Week 4
January 2011, Week 3
January 2011, Week 2
January 2011, Week 1
December 2010, Week 3
December 2010, Week 1
November 2010, Week 4
November 2010, Week 3
November 2010, Week 2
October 2010, Week 2
September 2010, Week 5
September 2010, Week 3
September 2010, Week 2
September 2010, Week 1
August 2010, Week 5

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTS.CLIR.ORG

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager