Print

Print


Due to the recent Lawsuit against Microsoft,
http://news.com.com/Will+Microsoft+tweak+IE%3F/2100-1012_3-5069943.html?tag=nl
courtesy of /., many sites that only work with IE may have to change a bit
and IE may even be changed.

This link is to IE View. What it does: Adds "View page in Internet Explorer"
links to the content and link context menu. Handy for previewing pages in
IE, loading up IE-only pages when you run across them in Mozilla, etc.
http://update.mozilla.org/extensions/moreinfo.php?id=35&vid=156

Hope this helps,

David

>From: Jeffrey Barnett <[log in to unmask]>
>Reply-To: Code for Libraries <[log in to unmask]>
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: [CODE4LIB] Pros and Cons of XUL development
>Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2004 09:54:45 -0400
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Received: from pickering.cc.nd.edu ([129.74.250.225]) by
>mc6-f15.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Fri, 3 Sep 2004
>07:06:43 -0700
>Received: from hazard (hazard.cc.nd.edu [129.74.250.229])by
>pickering.cc.nd.edu (Switch-3.1.6a/Switch-3.1.0) with ESMTP id
>i83C4bHG013725;Fri, 3 Sep 2004 08:54:48 -0500 (EST)
>Received: from LISTSERV.ND.EDU by LISTSERV.ND.EDU (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release
>         1.8d) with spool id 10407169 for [log in to unmask]; Fri, 3
>Sep          2004 08:54:48 -0500
>Received: from pickering.cc.nd.edu (pickering.cc.nd.edu [129.74.250.225])
>by          hazard.cc.nd.edu (Switch-3.1.4/Switch-3.1.0) with ESMTP id
>     i83DslrT029564 for <[log in to unmask]>; Fri, 3 Sep 2004
>  08:54:47 -0500 (EST)
>Received: from pantheon-po05.its.yale.edu (pantheon-po05.its.yale.edu
>    [130.132.50.34]) by pickering.cc.nd.edu (Switch-3.1.6a/Switch-3.1.0)
>       with ESMTP id i83Dskb8005962 for <[log in to unmask]>; Fri, 3
>         Sep 2004 08:54:46 -0500 (EST)
>Received: from [130.132.80.102] (systems13.library.yale.edu
>[130.132.80.102])          by pantheon-po05.its.yale.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11)
>with ESMTP id          i83DskMj004147 for <[log in to unmask]>; Fri,
>3 Sep 2004          09:54:46 -0400
>X-Message-Info: JGTYoYF78jG+3ud4AyYVgWCjCNeftPqJ
>User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7)
>    Gecko/20040616
>X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
>X-YaleITSMailFilter: Version 1.2a (attachment(s) not renamed)
>X-ND-MTA-Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2004 08:55:16 -0500 (EST)
>X-ND-Virus-Scan: engine v4.3.20; dat v4389
>Approved-By:  Jeffrey Barnett <[log in to unmask]>
>Message-ID:  <[log in to unmask]>
>Organization: Yale University Library
>Return-Path: [log in to unmask]
>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Sep 2004 14:06:44.0818 (UTC)
>FILETIME=[3E988320:01C491BF]
>
>I've been a Mozilla and more recently Firefox user for a long time, but
>only recently noticed the availability of extensions. (I know :") )  I'm
>really excited by the extensibility, but cautious about the tie-in to a
>single browser development environment.  I know Microsoft ignores this
>all the time, and unfortunately I'm finding more and more sites that
>seem to *require* IE to use.  My question is, even though the underlying
>XML is "open" and "standard", doesn't the use of XUL lead to the same
>sort of "lock out" for users of typical "public" services, such as
>libraries who frequently have no choice (or even knowledge) of which
>browser to use?
>
>Is there anything that can be done, or has been done, to take these
>great extensions, and the tools to create them and make them coexist
>with or "embrace and extend" the IE universe?

_________________________________________________________________
Check out Election 2004 for up-to-date election news, plus voter tools and
more! http://special.msn.com/msn/election2004.armx