On 7/13/06, Amy M Ostrom <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Or does anyone know about photo galleries and accessibility? There is a bigger group of people which can both see images and have accessibility needs; low-vision users (estimated some 30% of all users). Having said that, there's really nothing stopping you making tables perfectly accessible, and it the sense of images they *are* presented in a tabular fashion. This is where we use common sense instead of rigid rules, so there is no reason to feel that using tables for this is somehow wrong (unless you want to go into the whole WAI 2.0 debate :). Do it the way you do, and clean up the generated code to fix the worst offenders. If you still want to be strict on it, try talking to the GAWDS community (http://www.gawds.org/) about gallery options. I seem to recall there were some discussion about this a while back, but the gist was that most gallery software were equally crap in accessibility regards. Maybe things have changed. regards, Alex -- "Ultimately, all things are known because you want to believe you know." - Frank Herbert __ http://shelter.nu/ __________________________________________________