Binkley, Peter wrote: >There would probably be a lot of optimizations you could do within Solr >to help with this kind of thing. Art and I talked a little about this at >the ILS symposium: why not nestle the XML db inside Solr alongside >Lucene? Solr could then manage the indexing of the contents of the db, >and augment your search results with data from the db: you could get >full records as part of your search results without having to store them >in the Lucene index. > > At this point, why use a DB? Just store your records in your server file system. It's fast and less applications to worry about maintaining. If your search matches 5 records, just open those 5 files on your server. Good conversations ... getting excited for the conference already! Andrew