 |
 |
OSU++ At the risk of appearing impatient (probably not that far off at this point), if Dan is gone for a couple days, and this can be up on OSU this afternoon, what are we waiting for? Carol On 8/2/07, K.G. Schneider <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > Concur, adding that going with #3 or #2 (no preference from me formally > between the 2, you guys know better here) adds a much-needed release valve > so you don't have to make a decision about the permanent home under > pressure. > > > > I agree with this. Expectations of anvil's return to duty shouldn't > > add to the pressure of getting it running again. > > > > -Ross. > > > > On 8/2/07, Kevin S. Clarke <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > > > So, to that effect, here's what I think the current options are: > > > > > > > > 1) Get it back up on anvil > > > > 2) Get it up on Dan's Machine > > > > 3) Put it up here at OSU > > > > > > My order of preference would be #3 else #2... though Dan's machine > > > might be easier if he already has an older version on there. > > > > > > Kevin > > > > > > >