 |
 |
Peter Murray wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > I agree with Kevin's disagreement. Truncating the web display would > be okay, but truncating the content in the aggregator's feed would / > not/ be a good idea. > > I'd be OK with not truncating the feed, and only truncating the Web display. A Web page that when printed would be 115 pages is just way to long (I just did a print preview!) Edward > Peter > > On May 21, 2008, at 6:24 PM, Kevin S. Clarke wrote: >> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 5:25 PM, Edward M. Corrado <[log in to unmask] >> > wrote: >>> (4) Automatically truncate posts after X words. >> >> I hope we don't do this. I really like being able to read the post in >> my feed rather than having to click through to read it. > > - -- > Peter Murray http://www.pandc.org/peter/work/ > Assistant Director, New Service Development tel:+1-614-728-3600;ext=338 > OhioLINK: the Ohio Library and Information Network Columbus, Ohio > The Disruptive Library Technology Jester http://dltj.org/ > Attrib-Noncomm-Share http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) > > iD8DBQFINWwo4+t4qSfPIHIRAqKnAKC3RQIK/0EwMm+Dtv3I9z8LgVvz0ACeM7Zv > ZcC0dpix3fRTsZdXDv9dqeM= > =Lzgj > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----