 |
 |
Renata and others, After posting my original reply I realized how dumb it was to respond but say, sorry, can't tell you more. As an aside, this is one of the things that irritates me the most about working in a for profit environment: the control exerted by MPOW over just about anything. But hey, this is the job situation I've consciously chosen so, I guess I shouldn't complain. Although I can't name names and go into detail about our implementation, I have "anonymized" screenshots of various aspects of it and posted details about it at http://familymanlibrarian.com/2007/01/21/more-on-turning-the-catalog-inside-out/ Keep in mind that my involvement has been focused on the catalog side. A lot of the behind-the-scenes work also dealt with matching subject terms in catalog records to the much simpler taxonomy chosen for our website. You can imagine that it can be quite complicated to set up a good rule set for matching LCSH or MeSH terms effectively to a more generic set of taxonomy terms and have those be meaningful to end users. We are continually evaluating and tweaking this setup. As far as other general details, this implementation involved a lot of people, in fact a team of about 15, some more directly and exclusively and others peripherally. In terms of maintenance, day to day maintenance is handled by about three FTE. Our library catalog data is refreshed once a day, as is the citation database to which I referred in the previous email, and content from our web content management environment. A few other repositories are updated weekly because their content isn't as volatile. The whole planning and implementation process took a year and is still really working through implementation issues. For example we recently upgraded the version of our enterprise search tool to a newer version and this was a major change requiring a lot of resources and it took a lot more time to do than expected. I hope this additional information is helpful. Steve On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 1:11 AM, Dyer, Renata <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Our organisation is looking into getting an enterprise search and I was > wondering how many libraries out there have incorporated library > collection into a 'federated' search that would retrieve a whole lot: > a library collection items, external sources (websites, databases), > internal documents (available on share drives and/or records systems), > maybe even records from other internal applications, etc.? > > > I would like to hear about your experience and what is good or bad about > it. > > Please reply on or offline whichever more convenient. > > I'll collate answers. > > Thanks, > > Renata Dyer > Systems Librarian > Information Services > The Treasury > Langton Crescent, Parkes ACT 2600 Australia > (p) 02 6263 2736 > (f) 02 6263 2738 > (e) [log in to unmask] > > <https://adot.sirsidynix.net.au/uhtbin/cgisirsi/ruzseo2h7g/0/0/49> > > > ********************************************************************** > Please Note: The information contained in this e-mail message > and any attached files may be confidential information and > may also be the subject of legal professional privilege. If you are > not the intended recipient, any use, disclosure or copying of this > e-mail is unauthorised. If you have received this e-mail by error > please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete all > copies of this transmission together with any attachments. > ********************************************************************** >