Hi Nicole, Thanks for the suggestion. I haven't seen this one before. Edward Nicole Engard wrote: > I just learned about Alfresco yesterday: > http://wiki.alfresco.com/wiki/Main_Page was this one that you decided > against - or is it new to you? > > > --- > > Nicole C. Engard > Open Source Evangelist, LibLime > (888) Koha ILS (564-2457) ext. 714 > [log in to unmask] > AIM/Y!/Skype: nengard > > http://liblime.com > http://blogs.liblime.com/open-sesame/ > > > > On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 4:25 PM, Edward M. Corrado <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > >> Hello all, >> >> I've been investigating possible solutions for the beginnings of a >> repository of electronic documents [1]. At this point, we have no budget, so >> I am only looking at Open Source options. I've identified a number of >> options that may meet our needs that are either advertised as institutional >> repository software or digital library software. Basically what I am wonder >> is am I missing some OSS programs that in these categories that might work >> for us. Software that I have identified so far that looks promising are: >> >> DSpace: http://www.dspace.org/ >> Fedora: http://www.fedora-commons.org/ >> E-prints: http://www.eprints.org/ >> Greenstone: www.*greenstone*.org/ >> Kete: http://kete.net.nz/ >> Rescarta: http://www.rescarta.org/ >> >> >> I have identified some others, but rejected them because they were either >> experimental or appear not to be in current development. At this point we >> haven't really narrowed down our focus, so almost any digital library or >> institutional repository program would be under consideration, providing it >> is 1) somewhat fully developed (again, no budget), 2) somewhat easy to use >> and install, 3) has some level of user base, and 4) is actively being >> maintained. Does anyone have any suggestions for other software to >> investigate >> >> Edward >> >> [1] I'm not going to call this an institutional repository, because what I >> am envision is more of a hybrid of a digital library and institutional >> repository. I'd be less vague, but I only have a vague idea of what we want. >> >>