Conversation is definitely good. I didn't mean to dissuade anyone from having it. //Ed On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Edward M. Corrado <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > I'm not making any rules. I want an open discussion of the pros and cons. No > rules here. > > On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Jonathan Rochkind <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > >> Who's making rules? >> >> It's bad to discuss things without your peers before voting on them? I >> think it's a fine idea to discuss things before just blindly voting on them >> without discussion. Leads to better informed votes, does it not? >> >> >> >> Ed Summers wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Edward M. Corrado <[log in to unmask]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> I know there was a talk about a code4lib Europe in Portugal before. I'd >>>> love >>>> to see a European conference, but I am a little torn between making it a >>>> separate conference from Code4lib or as a location to host for Code4lib. >>>> What do people think? >>>> >>>> >>> >>> I think it's premature to worry about it, since there is no proposal >>> on the table. And if there were a proposal on the table, why not just >>> vote on it and not worry about making a rule about it? >>> >>> //Ed >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> Jonathan Rochkind >> Digital Services Software Engineer >> The Sheridan Libraries >> Johns Hopkins University >> 410.516.8886 rochkind (at) jhu.edu >> >