 |
 |
At Mon, 30 Mar 2009 10:12:39 -0400, Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress wrote: > Leaving aside religious issues I just want to be sure we're clear on one > point: the work required for the info URI process is exactly the amount of > work required, no more no less. It forces you to specify clear syntax and > semantics, normalization (if applicable), etc. If you go a different route > because it's less work, then you're probably avoiding doing work that needs > to be done. Reading over your previous message regarding mapping SuDocs syntax to URI syntax, I completely agree about the necessity of clarifying these rules. But I was referring to the bureaucratic overhead (little thought it may be) in registering an info: URI. This overhead may or may not be useful, but it is there, including a submission process, internal review, & public comments (according the draft info URI registry policy). -Erik