I agree with Ed. It would be best to omit the statement about the cover image if it doesn't actually exist. Keith On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 9:39 PM, Ed Summers<[log in to unmask]> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Karen Coyle<[log in to unmask]> wrote: >> Does it work for folks if this returns either a cover OR a blank? (1x1 jpg). >> It may be awkward to test first for an actual cover. Also, if it's ok to not >> test for a cover, does anyone have a preference over the blank or a 404 >> error? I think the API can do both. > > My personal preference would be to include the assertion about the > cover image only if it's true. It might be better to say nothing than > having to live with the false positives. But maybe some other people > feel differently about it. > > //Ed >