 |
 |
OK, so we'll only include cover images if we can test for them. - kc Keith Jenkins wrote: > I agree with Ed. It would be best to omit the statement about the > cover image if it doesn't actually exist. > > Keith > > > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 9:39 PM, Ed Summers<[log in to unmask]> wrote: > >> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Karen Coyle<[log in to unmask]> wrote: >> >>> Does it work for folks if this returns either a cover OR a blank? (1x1 jpg). >>> It may be awkward to test first for an actual cover. Also, if it's ok to not >>> test for a cover, does anyone have a preference over the blank or a 404 >>> error? I think the API can do both. >>> >> My personal preference would be to include the assertion about the >> cover image only if it's true. It might be better to say nothing than >> having to live with the false positives. But maybe some other people >> feel differently about it. >> >> //Ed >> >> > > > -- ----------------------------------- Karen Coyle / Digital Library Consultant [log in to unmask] http://www.kcoyle.net ph.: 510-540-7596 skype: kcoylenet fx.: 510-848-3913 mo.: 510-435-8234 ------------------------------------