Maybe you'd have to be e.e. cummings, but maybe not: the keyword "refactotum" leads to this: http://blog.thinkrelevance.com/2008/5/23/refactotum-overview ...which was what he described, and which sounds like a great session when led by the right hands. I think we could do it at c4lc. On Nov 10, 2009, at 10:44 AM, Jay Luker wrote: > Those. > > Slides. > > Don't. > > Help. > > --jay > > On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Tom Keays <[log in to unmask]> > wrote: >> Bad URL there. The real one is >> http://code4lib.org/files/chicks-lightning.pdf (that's where all the >> other lightning talks were stored). >> >> t >> >> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Jay Luker <[log in to unmask]> >> wrote: >>> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Dan Chudnov <[log in to unmask] >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> - "Heckle Me", based on the example/ideas behind Chick's >>>> lightning talk >>>> last year >>>> >>> >>> The PDF of chick's slides is 404-ing [1]. Can someone remind me what >>> this was about? >>> >>> --jay >>> >>> 1 http://code4lib.org/conference/2009/chicks-lightning.pdf >>> >>