Parts of one were started awhile back here:

Ryan Wick 

-----Original Message-----
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of John Fereira
Sent: Monday, December 21, 2009 11:59 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] yaoss4ll

Any thoughts on making this list something more dynamic, web 2.0ish?   I 
think the list could be even  more useful if one could do some sort of faceted search on the information. 

Looking at the not-viable list it seems that many of the entries were considered not viable due to lack of support.  It might be more useful if some sort of "level of support" ranking could be used rather than just deem some of the tools as not viable.  If a particular open source app is really useful, but lacks support, it *could* be viable if someone discovers it, and finds it useful enough that they're willing to start support it.

John Fereira
Cornell University
Twitter: @john_fereira
Google Wave: [log in to unmask]