codeplanet.code4lib.org++ On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Birkin James Diana <[log in to unmask]>wrote: > On Mar 25, 2010, at 12:47 PM, Ross Singer wrote: > > > ...GitHub/Google Code and their ilk... ...What would be useful... ...is > an aggregation of the Code4lib's community spread across these sites, sort > of what like the Planet does for blog postings... > > I love this idea. > > -b > > --- > Birkin James Diana > Programmer, Integrated Technology Services > Brown University Library > [log in to unmask] > [log in to unmask] > > > On Mar 25, 2010, at 12:47 PM, Ross Singer wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Aaron Rubinstein > > <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > > >> This is some of the best advice. Reading and adapting good code has > been my > >> favorite way to learn. There was a discussion a couple years back on a > >> code4lib code repository of some kind[1]. I'd love to resurrect this > idea. > >> A private pastebin[2] might be a decent option. I also know that a > number > >> of us use GitHub[3], which allows for collecting syntax highlighted code > >> snippets and has some nifty social networking features that let you > follow > >> other coders and projects. GitHub is certainly not a solution for a > >> code4lib repository but is another way to share code and learn from each > >> other. > >> > > > > I disagreed with this back in the day, and I still disagree with > > running our own code repository. There are too many good code hosting > > solutions out there for this to be justifiable. We used to run an SVN > > repo at code4lib.org, but we never bothered rebuilding it after our > > server got hacked. > > > > Actually I think GitHub/Google Code and their ilk are a much better > > solution -- especially for pastebins/gists/etc. What would be useful, > > though, is an aggregation of the Code4lib's community spread across > > these sites, sort of what like the Planet does for blog postings, etc. > > or what Google Buzz does for the people I follow (i.e. I see their > > gists). > > > > I'd buy in to that (and help support it), but I'm not sure how one > > would go about it. > > > > -Ross. >