 |
 |
I appreciate having delicious in the planet. Code4Lib's usage of this is one of the few reasons I'm still using delicious (which then posts for me to pinboard.in). I'd appreciate more organization of code4lib photos, if anybody wants to take stewardship of the flickr group we seem to have... -Jodi On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Michael J. Giarlo < [log in to unmask]> wrote: > Reasonable arguments. The nice thing is that if delicious is removed, > you can just subscribe to: > > http://feeds.delicious.com/v2/rss/tag/code4lib > > Ultimately this comes down to preference and jrochkind's stewardship. > :) (Personally, I've always found the delicious stuff a distraction; I > can already track that elsewhere.) > > -Mike > > > > On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 17:35, Rosalyn Metz <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > I agree with Ranti. Delicious has become a way for us to share articles > we find interesting to other people following the planet feed. I would hate > for that medium to disappear. > > > > Rosalyn > > > > > > > > > > Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone with SprintSpeed > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Ranti Junus <[log in to unmask]> > > Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 17:25:07 > > To: <[log in to unmask]> > > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Planet code4lib - FLICKR > > > > I'm a bit hesitant about removing delicious from the feed because I > > think this burst is a temporary only. I like the idea that anything > > code4lib will come in "one feed package" (that is, I don't have to go > > and check on separate places.) But one's mileage might vary. If the > > majority want it removed from the feed, then it's fine by me. > > > > > > ranti. > > > > On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Kevin S. Clarke <[log in to unmask]> > wrote: > >> +1 to all that as well > >> > >> Kevin > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Michael J. Giarlo > >> <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > >>> +1 to removing flickr > >>> +1 to removing delicious as well > >>> +1 to jrochkind using his discretion > >>> > >>> -Mike > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 11:36, Jonathan Rochkind <[log in to unmask]> > wrote: > >>>> Yep, I agree, I'll remove flickr from the planet. > >>>> > >>>> CC'ing code4lib listserv in case anyone cares, you can make your case > (on > >>>> list or in private email to me), but at the moment as 'editor' of the > planet > >>>> I'm exersizing my editorial discretion to agree with Bernadette (I had > the > >>>> same opinion, but was waiting to see if any 'users' asked for it > before > >>>> doing it. :) ). > >>>> > >>>> [Other options for awareness of code4lib photos: 1) Someone could add > a > >>>> link to flickr search for tag code4lib to the code4lib home page, > perhaps > >>>> under 'photos'. 2) If you happen to know that there are a bunch of > photos > >>>> at a given time (like now), you could delicious-bookmark the _search > >>>> results_ for 'code4lib' tag on flickr. Delicious tag code4lib is > still on > >>>> the planet. But please don't bookmark every individual photo, or we'll > be > >>>> back at square 1, heh. 3) Something else I haven't thought of. ] > >>>> > >>>> Jonathan > >>>> > >>>> Eric Lease Morgan wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> On Feb 27, 2010, at 2:33 PM, Bernadette Houghton wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Hi Eric, all the code4lib photos currently being posted on flickr > are > >>>>>> playing havoc with my feed reader and driving me around the bend. > Would it > >>>>>> be possible to remove that feed from planet code4lib? Or at least, > if photos > >>>>>> must be posted, can they be posted to a single web page so that feed > readers > >>>>>> don't get clogged up with 200 or so photos. There must have been at > least > >>>>>> that many in these past few days. > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> I'm sorry, but I am unable to help you in this regard. Maybe Jonathan > >>>>> Rochkind <[log in to unmask]> will be able to help... > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Bulk mail. Postage paid. > > >