 |
 |
Confidentiality Notice - This e-mail transmission, and any documents, files or previous e-mail messages attached to it, may contain information that is confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you must not read or play this transmission and that any disclosure, copying, printing, distribution or use of any of the information contained in or attached to this transmission is Strictly Prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately notify the sender by telephone or return e-mail and delete the original transmission and its attachments without reading or saving in any manner. Thank you. Federal Tax Advice Disclaimer - We are required by U. S. Treasury Regulations to inform you that, to the extent this message includes any federal tax advice, this message is not intended or written by the sender to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding federal tax penalties. -----Original Message----- From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of stuart yeates Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 4:11 PM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] A newbie question Karen Coyle wrote: > Quoting John Moss <[log in to unmask]>: > >> I trying to wrap my head around the differences between Dublin Core >> and FRBR. Is one based upon the other? If so, which came first? > > 1) totally unrelated, apples and grommets > 2) DC started up first; FRBR was issued in 1998, but didn't get much > attention for the first 10 years of its life. DC was getting > increasing use during that time. 3) DC takes a 'start simple' approach whereas FRBR attempts to encompass every bibliographic need 4) DC can be readily applied to almost any media/data; FRBR really only fits human-generated things that have been 'published' in some sense. cheers stuart -- Stuart Yeates http://www.nzetc.org/ New Zealand Electronic Text Centre http://researcharchive.vuw.ac.nz/ Institutional Repository Stuart, Thanks for that clarification