That is probably correct. England may appear as both a 110 *and* a 151 because the 110 signifies the concept for the country entity while the 151 signifies the concept for the geographic place. A subtle distinction... Andy. > -----Original Message----- > From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of > Ya'aqov Ziso > Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 11:56 > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] LCSH and Linked Data > > Ralph, Owen's pointing to a list where corporate (110) and geographic > names > (151) are mixed. > > Thanks Owen, I haven't seen that the first time. I guess you got that > mixed > 110/151 when limiting to 'exact name'. Perhaps Andrew has a workaround. > > *Ya'aqov* > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 10:34 AM, LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > > If you look at the fields those names come from, I think they mean > > England as a corporation, not England as a place. > > > > Ralph > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On > Behalf > > Of > > > Owen Stephens > > > Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 11:28 AM > > > To: [log in to unmask] > > > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] LCSH and Linked Data > > > > > > Still digesting Andrew's response (thanks Andrew), but > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Ya'aqov Ziso <[log in to unmask]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > *Currently under id.loc.gov you will not find name authority > > records, but > > > > you can find them at viaf.org*. > > > > *[YZ]* viaf.org does not include geographic names. I just > checked > > there > > > > England. > > > > > > > > > > Is this not the relevant VIAF entry > > > http://viaf.org/viaf/14299580<http://viaf.org/viaf/142995804> > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Owen Stephens > > > Owen Stephens Consulting > > > Web: http://www.ostephens.com > > > Email: [log in to unmask] > > > > > > -- > *ya'aqov**ZISO | **[log in to unmask] **| 856 217 3456 > > *