 |
 |
I agree with Luciano that the lead time was a bit short for me. Well, maybe not specifically because it was short, but it does conflicts with something else I have to do and I don't have time to reschedule. I really like this idea and I hope it can be successful, so I hope this message brought a rash of sign-ups and it goes on, or it is rescheduled. Edward On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Luciano Ramalho <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Peter Murray <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >> So far no one has signed up to present on Monday and only one person has signed up to attend. It sounds like the idea of virtual lightning talks isn't going to fly. If you have feedback (e.g., not interesting, not enough lead time to prepare, wrong time of day/week/year), I'd appreciate hearing it. > > As a Pythonista I am a huge fan of lightning talks, a staple of PyCons > all over the World. > > Virtual lightning talks is a novel idea to me, but sounds great. > > I'd be interested in attending and even presenting, but I think the > lead time was too short, particularly for an activity intended for > business hours (1:30pm EDT is 2:30pm BRT / UTC-3). > > How about trying again, but aiming at a date in late April? > > -- > Luciano Ramalho > programador repentista || stand-up programmer > Twitter: @luciano >