 |
 |
In the end, it is only the output format that matters to anyone except the data producer/holder. You can have whatever you want in your system and I could not care less -- I only care when I need to process data you provide, and at that moment I cared deeply how you provide it. What I care deeply about is that it be provided in as simple a format as possible while not losing any of the granularity, semantics, etc. that my application requires. Given that, if Schema.org works for me I won't go any farther, and I happen to hold the view that I am more like the rest of the planet than not. Roy On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 7:39 AM, Simon Spero <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Ed Summers <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > >> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Simon Spero <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >> > [cue edsu ] >> >> And people wonder why Google/Yahoo/Bing chose to favor html5 microdata >> on schema.org :-) >> > > HTML is an output format; > > BTW, if you didn't see it, the folks at DERI created http://schema.rdfs.org/ > > > (https://github.com/mhausenblas/schema-org-rdf) >