 |
 |
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Simon Spero <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Ethan Gruber <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Suppose I have RDF describing an object, and I would like some >> fairly free-form human generating description about the object (let's say >> within <dcterms:description>). Is it semantically acceptable to have XHTML >> nested directly in this element or would this be considered uncouth for LOD? >> > > Free-form human generating is considered uncouth except behind closed > doors, but XML literals are explictly provided for - see > http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-concepts-20040210/#dfn-rdf-XMLLiteral This does assume, however, that the object is a well-formed XML document and not just text with markup in it (although I think Ethan's original post implies this). -Ross. > > Simon