 |
 |
Excellent, thank you Katie! Nathan On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Katie Filbert <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Nathan Tallman <[log in to unmask]> > wrote: > > > That's what I'm worried about with MediaWiki. The syntax used when > creating > > and editing pages isn't intuitive and I'm afraid people won't want to use > > it. I was hoping someone would recommend a wiki with more of a WYSIWYG > type > > of editing interface. Was also hoping to stick with FLOSS, but perhaps I > > should at least peak at Confluence. > > > > It's still experimental but the Wikimedia Foundation is developing a visual > WYSIWYG type editor. > > http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/VisualEditor:Sandbox (try it) > > http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:VisualEditor > > The goal is to make it easier to edit without the wiki syntax. There still > will be an "advanced" edit option so that people can still use markup if > they want. > > Cheers, > Katie Filbert > > > > > > Thanks for the input, > > Nathan > > > > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 8:50 AM, Nate Vack <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > > > > If you're expecting "everyone" to create and edit pages, > > > it will be very hard to get widespread adoption with it. > > > > > > > > > -- > Katie Filbert > Board member, Wikimedia District of Columbia > http://wikimediadc.org > [log in to unmask] > @filbertkm / @wikimediadc >