 |
 |
These wikis use Git as their backend for tracking changes. Kinda cool: https://github.com/al3x/git-wiki http://el-tramo.be/software/wigit/ -Shaun On 7/25/12 9:34 PM, Nate Vack wrote: > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Cary Gordon <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >> WYSIWYG editors are the bane of my existence. > > Well... it depends on what you want. If you want clean, valid HTML, > then yes -- WYSIWYG editors are unholy abominations unleashed upon the > earth. > > If you want documents to look mostly closely like the author intended, > they're not so bad. Occasionally we need to do a "paste it into > Notepad and then back" maneuver, but it's rare. > > Sometimes people do really, really strange things like pasting an > entire web page or Word document into the Wiki editor. For extra fun, > paste an entire wiki editor into the wiki editor. That's its own > meta-trip. > > But the worst case response tends to be "How the heck did you do that? > Let's revert that, shall we?" > > -n > -- Shaun D. Ellis Digital Library Interface Developer Firestone Library, Princeton University voice: 609.258.1698 | [log in to unmask]