 |
 |
On the other hand, a typical user would expect an in-application feature called "zoom" to zoom. There's a tension between website behavior and application behavior that has yet to be resolved. I think this is the key element where responsive design faces a challenge. Not every use case with a small viewport is well-served by the same interface, so some compromise inevitably manifests in the "narrow" response. (This may also be true of larger viewports -- but the obvious examples that come to mind are all at the small end.) On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Jennifer Goslee <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > I agree with the intial responses: > > For the functionality they desire, they should be using an OS level > magnification tool. > > A responsive website should always behave like a website, NOT like word > document. It is not a reasonable request to change the behavior for this > one use case. (And if you change it for this one, what demand will be made > next?) >