 |
 |
I think it's quite likely that we will have at least one proposal for 2017 -- perhaps more. I don't think we need to worry about 2017. Roy On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Brian Rogers <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Agreed on the wording. Because, while at this point I'm guessing we'll be > able to find a physical home for 2017... if per chance that doesn't > happen... the rollover money from last year's conference presumably has to > go somewhere, in the interim. >