We at Purdue Libraries are on the same boat. Already talked with OCLC about hosted solution, but we are really now thinking of and looking into a better local alternative. We don't plan to make any moves any time soon so would be very interested in hearing what others are doing/planning. -- Noel — Noel Díaz Instruction & Research Services Administrator Information Technology Department Purdue University Libraries E-Mail: [log in to unmask] On 10/5/16, 9:16 AM, "Code for Libraries on behalf of Christopher H Day" <[log in to unmask] on behalf of [log in to unmask]> wrote: I wanted to solicit some feedback and advice from my code4lib colleagues about Digital Collections and Institutional Repository software solutions. For the past several years we have used a local installation of CONTENTdm as our digital repository [http://digital-libraries.saic.edu/]. Due to OCLC's recent announcement of a shift to a "hosted only" model for CONTENTdm, we are starting to research our options for change. We would like to be able to provide additional functionality for our library digital collections, and to provide our campus with a more versatile institutional repository. If your institution is using CONTENTdm Hosted, Islandora, Digital Commons, or other similar products, I'd love to get a feel for your experiences -- especially about migrating to your current platform from an earlier product. If you have some time for a few brief questions by email please feel free to contact me off list. Thanks very much for your time. Chris -- *Christopher Day *Digital Resources Librarian MacLean Visual Resources Center John M. Flaxman Library | The School of the Art Institute of Chicago 37 South Wabash, 6th FL, Chicago, IL 60603 312.899.5101 | [log in to unmask] http://libraryguides.saic.edu/vrc | https://digital-libraries.saic.edu