 |
 |
> Nominally, this is true. But these systems look more similar on the surface than they are so it really does depend on what you need. A good candidate for Alma probably is not a good candidate for WMS and vice versa. The reasons for this are better explained in a phone call than an email, I think a number of us have limited experience with either, and would like to hear more, but we aren't all going to call you on the phone. :) Kyle, if you wanted to write a review/overview, I think it would be very well-received. (Assuming you don't work for either vendor, which I don't think you do). Here, on your blog, maybe in the Code4Lib Journal or elsewhere, whatever. These systems are both fairly new, but have both been around long enough that some analysis/comparison is possible. I'd LOVE to see someone who has been exposed to both enough to be able to do so (which isn't everyone) write a comparative review. Jonathan On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 7:51 PM, Kyle Banerjee <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 11:05 AM, Josh Welker <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > > ...Alma and WMS ... have essentially the same > > core features, albeit quite different workflows and interfaces. After > > viewing several hours of demos for Alma and WMS, I can say pretty > > confidently that they are two products trying to solve the same problems > in > > relatively similar ways and that the way they do it is distinct from > other > > products in the ILS marketplace right now... > > > Nominally, this is true. But these systems look more similar on the surface > than they are so it really does depend on what you need. A good candidate > for Alma probably is not a good candidate for WMS and vice versa. The > reasons for this are better explained in a phone call than an email, but it > boils down to the fact that every system is based on assumptions about who > uses what and and how -- and the differences in these assumptions are > important. The best way to get a feel for what to expect would be to do a > field trip to a library that has similar needs to your own for each system > and talk directly to staff of all levels. > > The SaaS vs. PaaS distinction is not that significant if the vendor does > the actual maintenance. On an aside note, a growing number of SaaS > providers are partially or fully hosted on PaaS vendors such as Amazon. > Alma falls into this category. For example, if you have a lot of digital > inventory with thumbnail, access, and master copies, each with different > access restrictions, you can upload it directly with descriptive and > administrative metadata directly to S3 and just appears in Alma. > > On the platform issue, it also would be a mistake to make assumptions about > what kind of data it's even possible to share. You may find that you can > share much less where everyone is on the same system than you could on a > distributed system because of baked in privacy/security assumptions -- this > has huge implications for what you can do. > > The short version of this long email is to arrange a few site visits -- the > info you'll get is 1000 times better than anything you can get remotely. > Given the magnitude of an ILS investment, it will be well worth it. > > kyle >