 |
 |
I'd like to thank Eric, Carol and Tim for resurfacing this thread, Like Tim, I disagree with Eric's ordering, and would place chartering at the top of my list (with incorporation second and doing nothing last). I am not sure why Eric thinks that obtaining fiscal sponsorship from another organization suggests that "we" are giving up autonomy. The previous discussions with both ALA/LITA and DLF/CLIR have indicated that we will retain autonomy (presumably in conference planning, particularly around the program). My preference would be to consider DLF/CLIR as the preferable option, which is informed by the due diligence undertaken by FCIG, as well as the organization's track record. They are already hosting this email list, and have demonstrated the ability to provide this support of financial infrastructure for a number of initiatives and collaborations, including IIIF, IIPC, and several others. Best, Mark