 |
 |
Certainly interesting to see a CoC that prohibits offensive comments about political beliefs but neglects to include ethnicity. Combined with the oddly limited "religious beliefs" (as opposed to the more standard and open-ended "religion"), I wonder how one would go about reporting most antisemitism. T On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 2:32 PM Tom Johnson <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > i think it would be fantastic if the existing links from the About page > were made more prominent and/or updated to emphasize that this is an > authoritative document. > > i admit to not understanding the question about "draft" vs "official", or > the scare quotes. i think we should avoid undermining the status of this > long standing and painstakingly maintained piece of community > infrastructure. > > - tamsin > > > On Fri, May 14, 2021, 11:14 AM Eric Lease Morgan <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > > On May 14, 2021, at 2:02 PM, Mark A. Matienzo <[log in to unmask]> > > wrote: > > > > >> Do Code4Lib have an official Code of Conduct statement, not a draft. > And > > >> if so, then what is its URL? --Eric Morgan > > > > > > Yes: > > > > https://github.com/code4lib/code-of-conduct/blob/main/code_of_conduct.md > > > > > > -- > > > Mark A. Matienzo > > > PO Box 80831 > > > Unceded Duwamish Lands / Seattle, WA 98108 > > > https://matienzo.org/ > > > > > > Thank you for the prompt reply. I saw/found that. Again thank you. Is it > > "official" or a draft? If it is "official", then I suggest it be made > more > > apparent somewhere under https://code4lib.org. Otherwise, how is a > person > > suppose to know where to find/get canonical Code4Lib information? --Eric > > Morgan > > > -- Check out my library at http://www.librarything.com/profile/timspalding