 |
 |
I tried out the new WorldCat.org today, and decided to look for a book that we had recently added to our collection to see if our automated holdings update process was working. I was concerned when WorldCat showed me, under "Find a Copy at a Library", that the closest library that holds a copy was SUNY - 420 km away from the library I'm sitting in. I could click "Borrow" to open up a view of the item in SUNY's own library catalogue. Then I noticed that the details default to a new "Featured libraries" list. Beside that is a plain text "All libraries" label. It turns out that is a clickable link (a bit odd, because all of the other clickable text on the page is either blue or underlined). When I clicked on it, my library was listed at the top of a long list of libraries closer than SUNY, as you would expect. Yay, our holdings update process is working. However, you cannot interact with any of the libraries in the "All libraries" list. They're just an institution name, possibly a library name, and a geographic location. Nothing is clickable. For years prior to the revamp, however, every library that held a copy was listed in order of proximity to you, and you could click on any one of the entries to be brought to that library's catalogue page for that item. (Assuming you had updated your library info in OCLC's registry, of course.) I couldn't understand why OCLC revamped their website and *removed* functionality until I checked out their "For librarians" page ( https://www.worldcat.org/for-librarians) which "invite[s] you to learn more about our web visibility program and how your library can participate." The Web Visibility program (https://www.oclc.org/en/web-visibility.html) says: "Your library’s collections can be represented in WorldCat, visible on WorldCat.org, and shared by our visibility partners through a variety of subscription choices." -- cha-ching! Thanks to the Wayback Machine, the oldest version of that page (from April 2022 - https://web.archive.org/web/20220413144759/https://www.oclc.org/en/web-visibility.html) said: "When your library’s collections are represented in WorldCat through any cataloging subscription and you maintain a FirstSearch/WorldCat Discovery subscription, your library’s resources will be visible in WorldCat.org search results." In February, OCLC offered a "free streamlined holdings update process" to libraries that hadn't kept their holdings up to date, with the promise "Making these updates now will ensure the best presentation of your library’s (libraries’) collections on the new WorldCat.org when it becomes available." We, and presumably many other libraries, took advantage of the offer. I suspect one of the reasons OCLC made that offer free was to ensure their customers--ahem, members--were primed for adding a Web Visibility subscription. (It also helps their WorldCat ILL product, of course.) So the new WorldCat.org removed functionality in an apparent effort to squeeze more money out of their members to restore that functionality. And those who are unwilling or unable to pay up get shunted to a less visible list that offers no user interaction. Argh. I wish I could say I was surprised. Geez, somebody should work on getting all library catalogues to emit a standard representation of their holdings, say in schema.org format, so that it would be easy for search engines, projects, etc to aggregate the data and build services on top of that...