 |
 |
I've been thinking about checking out https://plausible.io/about, which is being used by https://upstream.force11.org/. You can get a hosted, paid version, but it's open source, so you can also run it yourself. I'd be curious to know if anyone has tried it out. Lisa ______________________________________________ Lisa Schiff (she/her) Associate Director Publishing, Archives, and Digitization California Digital Library University of California, Office of the President https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3572-2981 | @lschiff eScholarship | Calisphere | Online Archive of California -----Original Message----- From: Code for Libraries <[log in to unmask]> On Behalf Of Karly Wildenhaus Sent: Monday, November 21, 2022 7:59 AM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Matomo CAUTION: EXTERNAL EMAIL @Andrew—for a very simple counter, I've used GoatCounter <https://www.goatcounter.com/> on a static site and would recommend it. Karly On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 9:33 AM Andrew Ward <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > I don't mean to hijack the thread, but I'd be interested in hearing > what other analytics solutions people are using besides Matomo. I need > very little for my web reports--basically a counter on a few specific > pages. We don't do any higher analysis or events. I've long felt that > Google Analytics was too much for us. > > Thanks, > Andrew > > On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 2:01 PM Peter Velikonja <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I am also interested in getting a better understanding of Matomo. I > > am collecting analytics for about 40 public libraries, running > > Google Analytics, > Matomo, > > and another > > program, Clicky, in parallel for all of them; my original hope was > > to validate Google Analytics results. I do gain some insights, and > > this setup is useful for drilling down on anomalies like robot > > traffic bulges, but mostly I see variation. Each program gives me > > *comparable* results that I > > wish were more closely aligned; side-by-side comparisons are more > confusing > > than revealing to me. > > My basic conclusion is that none of these analytics programs can be > called > > accurate, they each > > interpret visits or users in their own way, and I'm pretty sure they > > all use a one-way or 'unreliable' socket protocol, so, unlike with a > > server log, I can't > assume > > every item served is > > represented. I'd like to develop better confidence in these > > analytics programs by getting a deeper understanding of how they > > really work. Thanks, > > > > peter > > > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 11:14 AM Heidi J. Webb <[log in to unmask]> > wrote: > > > > > Chad and others, > > > > > > I'm interested as well! We've been testing Matomo too with some > struggles > > > with usage reporting. > > > > > > We noticed that Matomo is not tracking all hits. At first, I > > > thought > > maybe > > > google analytics was tracking more bots or something but my team > > > purposefully went to a bunch of sites one day recently and only > > > usage > > from > > > one of the 5 devices we were using regardless of browser or > > > location > was > > > tracked and logged. > > > > > > This is currently on my list to investigate more and it sounds > > > like > Chad > > > has dug in much more deeply but since the topic made the listserv, > > > I > > would > > > welcome input. > > > > > > Heidi > > > > > > Heidi Webb | Discovery and Technology Services Upstate Medical > > > University | [log in to unmask] > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Code for Libraries <[log in to unmask]> On Behalf Of > Haefele, > > > Chad Mark > > > Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2022 9:41 AM > > > To: [log in to unmask] > > > Subject: [EXTERNAL] [CODE4LIB] Matomo > > > > > > With the July 2023 Google Analytics transition looming, we've been > > > evaluating Matomo as a possible replacement. > > > > > > Has anyone been robustly using Matomo who'd be willing to chat > > > about > it? > > > > > > I'm interested in general best practices, but also some specific > > > troubleshooting: > > > > > > Matomo was looking promising until I noticed a concerning > > > reporting > issue > > > on low-use pages: > > > -If I look for usage of those pages on a single specific day, > > > Matomo reports correctly. > > > -If I run the same report for a date range that includes that same > > > day, Matomo reports no usage. We've reprocessed the data from raw > > > logs as > > Matomo > > > suggests, without improvement. > > > > > > Thank you, > > > Chad > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > Chad Haefele > > > he/him/his > > > Head of User Experience > > > UNC University Libraries > > > [log in to unmask] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Peter Velikonja > > Head of Research, Koios LLC > > http://www.koios.co > > *Let's reconnect public libraries with the public.* > > > > > -- > Andrew Ward (he/him/his) > Digital Services Librarian > Troy Public Library >