 |
 |
Dear All, I currently teach workshops on Tropy for managing research photos, and it works well, but I've read good things about digiKam, and I'm wondering what folks's experiences have been. Both are open source, cross platform solutions -- very good. From what I can glean, digiKam offers more advanced tools, like facial recognition, as well as more image manipulation tools -- and that it saves image manipulations to disk (whereas Tropy applies its simple image manipulations "on top" of the images, so to speak, not touching the original). Similarly, DigiKam appears to have the ability to add metadata directly to the image files themselves or to XMP sidecar files if the image format is incompatible, which seems attractive. However, I'm wondering if Tropy's flexible metadata templates are a bit more robust and easier to work with. In any case, has anyone worked with both, and what would you recommend? (And no, you cannot say, "just find the installation file for the last release of Picasa and hold on to it forever"). Thank you for reading. Best, Dan -- *Daniel Johnson, Ph.D.* *Interim Co-Director, Navari Family Center for Digital Scholarship * *English; Digital Humanities**; and Film, Television, and Theatre * *Librarian* *University of Notre Dame* 250C Hesburgh Library Notre Dame, IN 46556 o: 574-631-3457 e: [log in to unmask]