On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 09:05:37AM -0500, Jonathan Gorman wrote:
> I'm not a fan of the name either and didn't vote for it.
Who really did vote for /lib/dev? Somebody please speak up and defend
the choice. Are we sure there wasn't some ballot-stuffing going on?
Is a recount in order? Where's the paper trail?
I like plain old boring Code For Libraries myself (maybe with the same
explanatory subtitle: A Journal for Library Programmers). That sounds
to me like a journal that will be around for a while.