LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for CODE4LIB Archives


CODE4LIB Archives

CODE4LIB Archives


CODE4LIB@LISTS.CLIR.ORG


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CODE4LIB Home

CODE4LIB Home

CODE4LIB  January 2020

CODE4LIB January 2020

Subject:

Re: matching brief cataloging to OCLC records - scores

From:

Kyle Banerjee <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Code for Libraries <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 7 Jan 2020 15:06:52 -0800

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (104 lines)

Hi Cindy,

What constitutes a reasonable path depends on the time, labor, and skills
you have access to. Having said that, my gut reaction would be to keep
things simple as Kylene suggests. If key data points from your original
spreadsheet are put side by side with the corresponding ones from the OCLC
records to mark the OCLC records you want to be downloaded and separate out
the ones that will be more work. Eyeballing and marking 17K records isn't
as crazy as it sounds if the match strategy is decent and the work process
is sufficiently ergonomic/efficient.

It might be worthwhile to a more precise strategy on an initial pass and
progressing to dirtier methods on subsequent passes. One advantage of the
multiple passes method is that it will help you develop a good sense of
what your and OCLC's data are like and the best way to line things up.

kyle

On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 6:33 AM Harper, Cynthia <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> I have 17,000 records at this point.  The data is forced into MARC format
> from a spreadsheet.  I don't know how reliable the music number is. I tried
> the sample record below and find not match in OCLC, although there are
> other scores with an 028 that matches this number (not the same
> composer/title though).
>
> Thanks,
> Cindy
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Code for Libraries <[log in to unmask]> On Behalf Of Kyle
> Banerjee
> Sent: Monday, January 06, 2020 5:55 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] matching brief cataloging to OCLC records - scores
>
> Hi Cindy,
>
> Could you say a bit more about your project -- i.e. how many items you're
> dealing with, uniqueness of records you need to match against, reliability
> of the individual data points you're using for your key?
>
> As an abstract proposition, dirty matches are tricky. The basic approaches
> are to create a similarity quotient or to use fragments of fields you can
> reliably expect to find (kind of like old school OCLC derived searches).
>
> Unless you truly have a lot of records, I wouldn't rule out manual methods
> for a substantial amount of the work -- for a second pass, humans are
> prettty efficient at cutting through thousands of records.
>
> kyle
>
> On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 11:07 AM Harper, Cynthia <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> > Hello -  I want to match some brief cataloging records for music
> > scores to OCLC record numbers.  I am inconversation with OCLC about
> > doing this with a reclamation/datasync type process, but I'm not
> > optimistic about that, because there's going to be a lot of mismatch in
> the details.
> >
> > Here's a sample record:
> > =LDR  \\\\\ncm a22\\\\\ a 4500
> > =935  \\$aLAiO|Adams, Leslie|Hosanna to|2927|Walton Music|1976|Vocal
> > Score For Satb Chorus And Piano
> > =100  1\$aAdams, Leslie.
> > =245  \\$aHosanna to the Son of David.
> > =028  32$a2927
> > =264  \1$aNew York : $bWalton Music Corporation , $c1976.
> > =300  \\$aScore, not-stapled, soft-cover; $c26.6 cm
> > =336  \\$anotated music$bntm$2rdacontent
> > =337  \\$aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia
> > =338  \\$avolume$bnc$2rdacarrier
> > =500  \\$aVocal score for SATB chorus and piano
> > =700  1\
> > =700  1\
> > =700  1\
> > =910  \$aLewis Collection - Anthems in Octavo
> > =910  \$aFile Cabinet 5, drawer 1
> >
> > That 935 is my attempt to cobble a "Unique" key from the records.  I'm
> > thinking those blank 710s (editor, arranger, translator) will be
> > removed by MarcEdit.
> >
> > I think what would be best would be to search OCLC API by title +
> > composer
> > + mat-type=score, and check through these for a matching 028 and
> > + matching
> > significant words in the 500 note, and produce an output of multiple
> > rows for any matching records, to be combed through via the next set
> > of automated process.
> >
> > What software exists to do this?  Your wisdom is appreciated.
> >
> >
> > Cindy Harper
> > E-services and periodicals librarian
> > Virginia Theological Seminary
> > Bishop Payne Library, VTS Box 159
> > 3737 Seminary Road
> > Alexandria VA 22304
> > [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> > 703-461-1794
> >
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTS.CLIR.ORG

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager