Hey Ed (& everyone),
Don't sweat it. As someone who just managed to get on the program only
after some cancellations, I am glad to give you whatever absolution I can
offer. The range of content was and is truly astounding, and there is
built-in capacity for more topics with the lightning talks and breakout
sessions. Outside of Access, my dilemma is how to seriously consider any
other conferences now that I have been exposed to this process. I had a
hard time limiting my votes to 11, just think of how many conferences that
go on for similar or longer periods where it is hard to fill even one full
day with interesting sessions.
art
Ed Summers <[log in to unmask]>
Sent by: Code for Libraries <[log in to unmask]>
01/11/2006 10:55 AM
Please respond to
Code for Libraries <[log in to unmask]>
To
[log in to unmask]
cc
Subject
[CODE4LIB] code4lib 2006 presentations & schedule (part duh)
So it probaby wasn't a good idea of me to include a link for all the
presentation topics that were submitted.
Let me just say that I included it only to illustrate the high quality
presentation topics that were submitted, not to make anyone feel bad
about not being able to present. It was truly amazing to see these
presentation ideas come in.
As someone who voted I found it extremely hard to limit my selections,
and if I could I would have wanted every single presentation that was
submitted.
Just thought I should clarify that.
//Ed
|