Binkley, Peter wrote:

>There would probably be a lot of optimizations you could do within Solr
>to help with this kind of thing. Art and I talked a little about this at
>the ILS symposium: why not nestle the XML db inside Solr alongside
>Lucene? Solr could then manage the indexing of the contents of the db,
>and augment your search results with data from the db: you could get
>full records as part of your search results without having to store them
>in the Lucene index.
>
>
At this point, why use a DB?  Just store your records in your server
file system.  It's fast and less applications to worry about
maintaining.  If your search matches 5 records, just open those 5 files
on your server.

Good conversations ... getting excited for the conference already!

Andrew