LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for CODE4LIB Archives


CODE4LIB Archives

CODE4LIB Archives


CODE4LIB@LISTS.CLIR.ORG


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CODE4LIB Home

CODE4LIB Home

CODE4LIB  January 2007

CODE4LIB January 2007

Subject:

Re: Lucene Newbie Question

From:

Bess Sadler <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Code for Libraries <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:42:45 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (111 lines)

Hi, Andrew and all the other code4libbers,

I wanted to add that if your goal is to prepare for the pre-
conference, it probably isn't necessary to get down and dirty with
the lucene libraries. Of course I would never discourage anyone from
playing around with them, but at the same time please don't feel you
need to do that in order to participate in the pre-conference.

Before solr, if you wanted to use lucene you had to call the low-
level lucene libraries directly and write your own lucene
implementation. Solr provides a very convenient wrapper for it all,
though, and it's much easier to use. Instead of accessing the lucene
libraries directly, you just fire up solr, massage your data into an
XML file that matches solr's expected input format, and POST your XML
file to a solr URL. They even provide you with a script to do the
POSTing. You can learn all this from the solr demo and tutorial,
available here: http://incubator.apache.org/solr/tutorial.html

So, if you're not all that good with java, and you just want to be
able to create and search a lucene index without spending the next
month learning a new programming language, I strongly recommend
skipping the lucene bit and jumping right into solr.

Just my $0.02,
Bess

On Jan 11, 2007, at 11:26 AM, Erik Hatcher wrote:

> Andrew,
>
>
>
>
> On Jan 11, 2007, at 10:47 AM, Andrew Darby wrote:
>> Hello, all.  I'm trying to get started with Lucene for the Code4Lib
>> preconference
>
> Excellent!!!
>
>> and was wondering if someone could help.
>
> Of course....
>
>> I'm trying to
>> do the first example from the Lucene site
>> (http://lucene.apache.org/java/docs/demo.html) on my Windows XP
>> machine but when I try to build the test index from the command line
>> like so:
>>
>> C:\lucene-2.0.0>java org.apache.lucene.demo.IndexFiles C:
>> \lucene-2.0.0/src
>>
>> I get the following error:
>>
>> Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
>> org/apache/lucene/demo/IndexFiles
>>
>> My CLASSPATH looks like this:
>>
>> .;C:\Program Files\QuickTime\QTSystem\QTJava.zip;C:\lucene-2.0.0
>> \build\lucene-core-2.0.1-dev.jar;C:\lucene-2.0.0\build\lucene-
>> demos-2.0.1-dev.jar;
>
> 2.0.1?  Where'd you get that version?
>
> I pulled down the latest stable release, 2.0.0, just now to run
> through this myself.
>
> Rather than setting CLASSPATH (an evil thing in the Java world, it
> can really bite you at inopportune times), I ran it this way
> successfully:
>
> java -cp lucene-core-2.0.0.jar:lucene-demos-2.0.0.jar
> org.apache.lucene.demo.IndexFiles src/
>
>> I assume this is a basic error, and something to do with the
>> classpath, but as best I can tell everything is correct, the
>> IndexFiles.class file is where it should be, etc.  I'm not familiar
>> with Java, if you haven't guessed.  Any suggestions?
>
> Sadly the demo that ships with Lucene is pretty weak.  For more
> examples, grab the Lucene in Action (LIA) codebase from http://
> www.lucenebook.com and fire it up simply by typing "ant" and
> following the instructions in the README too.  That code is for
> Lucene 1.4.3 - 1.9.x.  Lucene 2.0 removed deprecated methods, and
> there are a few tidbits of trivia to adjust LIA code to Lucene 2.0
> available here:
>
>        <http://www.nabble.com/Lucene-in-Action-examples-complie-
> problem-
> tf2418478.html#a6743189>
>
> The demo that ships with Lucene is barely usable for anything other
> than "yeah, it can search text, but boy is it a hassle to run".  Keep
> in mind that Lucene is a low-level library, so for there to be much
> of use out of it, you have to build something around it.  The Indexer
> and Searcher command-line apps in the LIA code base provide a better
> working demo "out of the box", but still quite crude.
>
>        Erik

Elizabeth (Bess) Sadler
Head, Technical and Metadata Services
Digital Scholarship Services
Box 400129
Alderman Library
University of Virginia
Charlottesville, VA 22904

[log in to unmask]
(434) 243-2305

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTS.CLIR.ORG

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager