OSU++

At the risk of appearing impatient (probably not that far off at this
point), if Dan is gone for a couple days, and this can be up on OSU this
afternoon, what are we waiting for?

Carol

On 8/2/07, K.G. Schneider <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> Concur, adding that going with #3 or #2 (no preference from me formally
> between the 2, you guys know better here) adds a much-needed release valve
> so you don't have to make a decision about the permanent home under
> pressure.
>
>
> > I agree with this.  Expectations of anvil's return to duty shouldn't
> > add to the pressure of getting it running again.
> >
> > -Ross.
> >
> > On 8/2/07, Kevin S. Clarke <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > > > So, to that effect, here's what I think the current options are:
> > > >
> > > > 1) Get it back up on anvil
> > > > 2) Get it up on Dan's Machine
> > > > 3) Put it up here at OSU
> > >
> > > My order of preference would be #3 else #2... though Dan's machine
> > > might be easier if he already has an older version on there.
> > >
> > > Kevin
> > >
> > >
>