Cloutman, David wrote:
> The only problem is that if you pass a bad URL (i.e. for an invalid LC
> Card number, the resulting page for either MARC XML or human readable
> view gives you a response code of 200 instead of 404. This means that if
> you're basing functionality in your application to grab the data from
> one of these URLs, you'll have to write a bunch of funky logic rather
> than relying on the http standard.
> Definitely a step in the right direction, but it needs tweaking.
This is great feedback. I hope you'll consider sending it back through
to the developers of this service using the link provided in the FAQ in
addition to sharing your thoughts here. :)