LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for CODE4LIB Archives


CODE4LIB Archives

CODE4LIB Archives


CODE4LIB@LISTS.CLIR.ORG


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CODE4LIB Home

CODE4LIB Home

CODE4LIB  May 2008

CODE4LIB May 2008

Subject:

Re: google books and OCLC numbers

From:

"Custer, Mark" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Code for Libraries <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 8 May 2008 11:42:20 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (178 lines)

Godmar,

Thank you for answering some of my questions (and I apologize for asking
anything that was more pertinent to an off-list discussion). I didn't
realize that the addison.vt.edu:2082 demo site was only showing "partial
view" links.  I had assumed, wrongly, that it was perhaps only excluding
"metadata view" and "no view" instances.  That said, I do think it's a
very elegant implementation of the GBS Viewability API into a
locked-down OPAC, and I'd like to see it implemented at my library as
well (or at least any implementation of a Google, LibraryThing, or
OpenLibrary API).

Also, I apparently haven't looked at the Viewability API enough, but you
did teach me something else by providing those examples.  I should've
explicitly said, too, that I was *not* doing a GBS search for
"oclc01052228" (and I just tried that to see what would happen, and it
does return the book, but the lone result is for page 52, an illustrated
page...?). I was, instead, using one of the basic viewability API
examples provided by Google, simply adding "oclc" to any of my requests
(I don't have a background in computer science, so I was just playing
around in order to test the rate of inclusion/recall in GBS for a local
set of books).  According to the API callback, it seems then that the
reason that I am finding the full view for this book is because it has 3
bib numbers (or bib keys) attached to its oclc number.

So, in addition to the two links that you included, this link also works
(but not because [I don't think] that string appears in the hidden
metadata)

http://books.google.com/books?jscmd=viewapi&bibkeys=OCLC01052228&callbac
k=X

So,

"bib_key":"OCLC01052228"
"bib_key":"OCLC:01052228"
"bib_key":"OCLC:1052228"

But not:

"bib_key":"OCLC1052228"

Is that right, or am I still missing something?


Mark Custer


-----Original Message-----
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
Godmar Back
Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2008 11:06 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] google books and OCLC numbers

Mark,

I'll answer this one on list, but let's take discussion that is
specifically related to GBS classes off-list since you're asking
questions about this particular software --- I had sent the first
email to Code4Lib because I felt that our method of integrating the
Google Book viewability API into III Millennium in a clean way was
worth sharing with the community.

On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 10:07 AM, Custer, Mark <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Slide 4 in that PowerPoint mentions something about a "small set of
>  Google Book Search information", but is also says that the items are
>  indexed by ISBN, OCLC#, and LCCN.  And yet, during the admittedly
brief
>  time that I tried out this really nice demo, I was unable to find any
>  links to books that were available in "full view", which made me
wonder
>  if any of the search results were searching GBS with their respective
>  OCLC #s (and not just ISBNs, if available).

GBS searches by whatever you tell it: ISBN, OCLC, *OR* LCCN. Not all of
them.

>
>  For example, if I use the demo site that's provided and search for
"mark
>  twain" and limit my results to publication dates of, say, 1860-1910,
I
>  don't receive a single GBS link.  So I checked to see if "Eve's
Diary"
>  was in GBS and, of course, it was... and then I made sure that the
copy
>  I found in the demo had the same OCLC# as the one in GBS; and it was.
>  So, is this a feature that will be added later, or is it just that
the
>  entire set of bib records available at the demo site are not included
in
>  the GBS aspect of the demo?

By "demo site" provided, do you mean addison.vt.edu:2082?
Remember that in this demo, the link is only displayed if Google has a
partial view, and *not* if Google has full text or no view. It's my
understanding that Twain's books are past copyright, so Google has
fully scanned them and they are available as full text.

If you take that into account, Eve's Diary (OCLC# 01052228) works
fine. I added it at the bottom of http://libx.org/gbs/tests.html
To search for this book by OCLC, you'd use this span:

<span title="OCLC:01052228" class="gbs-thumbnail gbs-link-to-preview
gbs-if-partial-or-full">Eve's Diary</span>

which links to the full text version. Note that --- interestingly ---
Google does not appear to have a thumbnail for this book's cover.

>
>  Secondly, I have another question which I hope that someone can clear
up
>  for me.  Again, I'll use this copy of "Eve's Diary" as an example,
which
>  has an  OCLC number of 01052228.  Now, if you search worldcat.org
(using
>  the advance search, basic search, of even adding things like "oclc:"
>  before the number), the only way that I can access this item is to
>  search for "1052228" (removing the leading zero).  And this is
exactly
>  how the OCLC number displays in the metadata record, directly below
the
>  field that states that there are 18 editions of this work.
>
>  All of that said, I can still access the book with either of these
URLs:
>
>  http://worldcat.org/wcpa/oclc/1052228
>  http://worldcat.org/wcpa/oclc/01052228
>
>  Now, I could've sworn that GBS followed a similar route, and so, I
>  previously searched it for OCLC numbers by removing any leading
zeroes.
>  As of at least today, though, the only way for me to access this book
>  via GBS is to use the OCLC number as it appears in the MARC record...
>  that is, by searching for "oclc01052228".
>
>  Has anyone else noticed this change in GBS (though it's quite
possible
>  that I'm simply mistaken)?  And could anyone inform me about the
>  technical details of any of these issues?  I mean, I get that
worldcat
>  has to also deal with ISSNs, but is there a way to use the search box
to
>  explicitly declare what type of number the query is... and why would
the
>  value need to have the any leading 0's removed in the metadata
display
>  (especially since the URL method can access either)?
>

That's a question about the search interface accessed at
books.google.com, not about the book viewability API. Those are two
different services. The viewability API advertises that it supports
OCLC: and LCCN: prefixes to search for OCLC and LCCN, respectively, in
addition to ISBNs, and that works in your example, for instance,
visit:

http://books.google.com/books?jscmd=viewapi&bibkeys=OCLC:01052228&callba
ck=X
or
http://books.google.com/books?jscmd=viewapi&bibkeys=OCLC:1052228&callbac
k=X

The books.google.com search interface doesn't advertise the ability to
search by OCLC number --- the only reason you are successful with
searching for OCLC01052228 is because this string happens to occur
somewhere in this book's metadata description, and Google has the full
content of the metadata descriptions indexed like it indexed webpages.

Take also a look at the advanced search interface at:
http://books.google.com/advanced_book_search
You'll find no support for OCLC or LCCN. It does show, however, than
isbn: can be used to search for ISBNs, in the style prefixes can be
used in other search interfaces.

 - Godmar

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

November 2024
October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTS.CLIR.ORG

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager