LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for CODE4LIB Archives


CODE4LIB Archives

CODE4LIB Archives


CODE4LIB@LISTS.CLIR.ORG


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CODE4LIB Home

CODE4LIB Home

CODE4LIB  May 2008

CODE4LIB May 2008

Subject:

Re: coverage of google book viewability API

From:

"Custer, Mark" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Code for Libraries <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 9 May 2008 12:03:44 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (71 lines)

Isn't the whole point of this to get the user to the book?  Knowledge
about the book should/will come from research and reading, not bad
metadata...  or even hastily automated extraneous info...  and in fact,
I'd say that most MARC metadata is only there to get a user to the book,
not to describe it to the user (aside from subjects), but mainly to
describe it to the library.

That said, I showed an example
(http://books.google.com/books?id=kdiYGQAACAAJ) in which a Google Books
"no view" gets a user to a "full view", completely electronically!
(though, my goodness, in the state it's in now it does require
experimentation and two extra mouse clicks)

What's more, Google already has a link for every book to Worldcat, which
helps the user get to a "full view", completely physically.  Ideally,
researchers will begin to have more and more opportunities to research
texts side-by-side with a physical and an electronic copy.  That is, of
course, once they have more options to download different formats rather
than just the rather large PDFs currently available at Google.

Right now, yes, most "no view" options offer far less information to a
user who can read a MARC record...  but I'd presume that as more texts
go online, the more value and richness will be added, even to those "no
view" cases.

Mark Custer


-----Original Message-----
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
Tim Spalding
Sent: Friday, May 09, 2008 11:44 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] coverage of google book viewability API

> Most of our users will start out in an electronic environment whether
we like it or not
> (most of us on THIS list like it)---and will decide,  based on what
they
> find there, on their own, without us making the decision for
> them---whether to obtain (or attempt to obtain) a copy of the physical
> book or not. Whether we like it or not.

>But if you think the options are between US deciding whether the user
should consult a physical book or not---then we're not even playing the
same game.

What I dislike here is your abnegation of the responsibility to care
about the choices students make. If you're not considering the value
of all resources-including the book-you're not playing the library
game, the educator game or the Google game. You're just throwing stuff
on screens because you can.

"Whether you like it or not" you're pointing students in some
directions and not others. You're giving these resources different
amounts of emphasis in your UI. You're including some and not
others-the others includes all other web pages and all other offline
resources. You aren't making choices for the user, but you're not
stepping back and washing your hands of the responsibility to help the
student.

In a physical-book context, the book is one of the resources. It
deserves to weighted and evaluated within this larger set of choices.
It's your responsibility to consider it within the mix of options. If
the book is excellent and the online resources poor, helping the user
means communicating this. So, sometimes the OPAC should basically say
"there's nothing good online about this book; but it's on the shelf
right over there."

*Certainly in Classics that's still true-the online world is a very
impoverished window into the discipline.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

December 2024
November 2024
October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTS.CLIR.ORG

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager