LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for CODE4LIB Archives


CODE4LIB Archives

CODE4LIB Archives


CODE4LIB@LISTS.CLIR.ORG


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CODE4LIB Home

CODE4LIB Home

CODE4LIB  September 2008

CODE4LIB September 2008

Subject:

Re: creating call number browse

From:

Steve Meyer <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Code for Libraries <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 29 Sep 2008 16:45:11 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (164 lines)

one counter argument that i would make to this is that we consistently 
hear from faculty that they absolutely adore browsing the stacks--there 
is something that they have learned to love about the experience 
regardless of whether they understand that it is made possible by the 
work of catalogers assigning call numbers and then using them for 
ordering the stacks.

at uw-madison we have a faculty lecture series where we invite 
professors to talk about their use of library materials and their 
research and one historian said outright, the one thing that is missing 
in the online environment is the experience of browsing the stacks. he 
seemed to understand that with all the mass digitization efforts, we 
could be on the edge of accomplishing it.

that said, i agree that we should do what you say also, just that we 
should not throw the baby out w/ the bath water. if faculty somehow 
understand that browsing the stacks is a good experience then we can use 
it as a metaphor in the online environment. in an unofficial project i 
have experimented w/ primitive interface tests using both subject 
heading 'more like this' and a link to a stack browse based on a call 
number sort:

http://j2ee-dev.library.wisc.edu/sanecat/item.html?resourceId=951506

(please, ignore the sloppy import problems, i just didn't care that much 
for the interface test)

as for the original question, this has about a million records and 
900,000 w/ item numbers and a simple btree index in the database sorts 
at an acceptable speed for a development test.

-sm

Walker, David wrote:
>> a decent UI is probably going to be a bigger job
> 
> I've always felt that the call number browse was a really useful option, but the most disastrously implemented feature in most ILS catalog interfaces.
> 
> I think the problem is that we're focusing on the task -- browsing the shelf -- as opposed to the *goal*, which is, I think, simply to show users books that are related to the one they are looking at.
> 
> If you treat it like that (here are books that are related to this book) and dispense with the notion of call numbers and shelves in the interface (even if what you're doing behind the scenes is in fact a call number browse) then I think you can arrive at a much simpler and straight-forward UI for users.  I would treat it little different than Amazon's recommendations feature, for example.
> 
> --Dave
> 
> ==================
> David Walker
> Library Web Services Manager
> California State University
> http://xerxes.calstate.edu
> ________________________________________
> From: Code for Libraries [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Stephens, Owen [[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 9:17 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] creating call number browse
> 
> I'm not sure, but my guess would be that the example you give isn't
> really a 'browse index' function, but rather creates a search result set
> and presents it in a specific way (i.e. via cover images) sorted by call
> number (by the look of it, it has an ID of the bib record as input, and
> it displays this book and 10 before it, and 10 after it, in call number
> order.
> 
> Whether this is how bibliocommons achieves it or not is perhaps besides
> the point - this is how I think I would approach it. I'm winging it
> here, but if I was doing some quick and very dirty here:
> 
> A simple db table with fields:
> 
> Database ID (numeric counter auto-increment)
> Bib record ID
> URIs to book covers (or more likely the relevant information to create
> the URIs such as ISBN)
> Call number
> 
> To start, get a report from your ILS with this info in it, sorted by
> Call Number. To populate the table, import your data (sorted in Call
> Number order). The Database ID will be created on import, automatically
> in call number order (there are other, almost certainly better, ways of
> handling this, but this is simple I think)
> 
> To create your shelf browse given a Bib ID select that record and get
> the database ID. Then requery selecting all records which have database
> IDs +-10 of the one you have just retrieved.
> 
> Output results in appropriate format (e.g. html) using book cover URIs
> to display the images.
> 
> Obviously with this approach, you'd need to recreate your data table
> regularly to keep it up to date (resetting your Database ID if you
> want).
> 
> Well - just how I'd do it if I wanted something up and running quickly.
> As Andy notes, a decent UI is probably going to be a bigger job ;)
> 
> Owen
> 
> Owen Stephens
> Assistant Director: eStrategy and Information Resources
> Central Library
> Imperial College London
> South Kensington Campus
> London
> SW7 2AZ
> 
> t: +44 (0)20 7594 8829
> e: [log in to unmask]
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf
> Of
>> Emily Lynema
>> Sent: 17 September 2008 16:46
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: [CODE4LIB] creating call number browse
>>
>> Hey all,
>>
>> I would love to tackle the issue of creating a really cool call number
>> browse tool that utilizes book covers, etc. However, I'd like to do
>> this
>> outside of my ILS/OPAC. What I don't know is whether there are any
>> indexing / SQL / query techniques that could be used to browse forward
>> and backword in an index like this.
>>
>> Has anyone else worked on developing a tool like this outside of the
>> OPAC? I guess I would be perfectly happy even if it was something I
>> could build directly on top of the ILS database and its indexes (we
> use
>> SirsiDynix Unicorn).
>>
>> I wanted to throw a feeler out there before trying to dream up some
>> wild
>> scheme on my own.
>>
>> -emily
>>
>> P.S. The version of BiblioCommons released at Oakville Public Library
>> has a sweet call number browse function accessible from the full
> record
>> page. I would love to know know how that was accomplished.
>>
>> http://opl.bibliocommons.com/item/show/1413841_mars
>>
>> --
>> Emily Lynema
>> Systems Librarian for Digital Projects
>> Information Technology, NCSU Libraries
>> 919-513-8031
>> [log in to unmask]

-- 
Stephen Meyer
Library Application Developer
UW-Madison Libraries
312F Memorial Library
728 State St.
Madison, WI 53706

[log in to unmask]
608-265-2844 (ph)


"Just don't let the human factor fail to be a factor at all."
- Andrew Bird, "Tables and Chairs"

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

November 2024
October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTS.CLIR.ORG

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager