LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for CODE4LIB Archives


CODE4LIB Archives

CODE4LIB Archives


CODE4LIB@LISTS.CLIR.ORG


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CODE4LIB Home

CODE4LIB Home

CODE4LIB  November 2008

CODE4LIB November 2008

Subject:

Re: Looking for your thoughts on the future of Libraries

From:

"Cloutman, David" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Code for Libraries <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 24 Nov 2008 11:19:37 -0800

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (119 lines)

I have to say, I couldn't agree more with John's sentiments about the
MLS not being as necessary for library technologists as the people
writing these job description seem to think it is. Between the time I
earned my MLIS and the time that I accepted my current position, I spent
seven years as a Web developer outside of libraryland. The technical and
communications skills I learned from my MLIS program helped me as a
consultant, both in getting started learning the technology that I used
in my practice, and developing a process in doing business analysis.
However, the MLIS was simply one path to that career, and I think, based
on the diversity of education I see in the IT and programming
professions, it is one of many, including a formal computer science
education. 

What I hear on the inside of libaryland to justify the MLIS requirement
is something that I haven't heard as often on the outside. The core
assumption seems to be, "we're different", which is true, but the
conclusion, which I find to be erroneous, is, "therefore you must be one
of us". Than means, a candidate must have a MLS. Of course this is
malarkey. What makes a technologist good at their job in the vast
majority of situations, in my opinion, is not the individuals knowledge
of the domain that their client works in, but their ability to conduct
proper business analysis in developing technical strategies, without
applying too many implicit assumptions. In most cases, it is not
necessary for a programmer to have specific domain knowledge to work for
a particular organization or on a specific project. One needn't
necessarily be a CPA or an MBA to write financial software, or to have a
JD to write legal software, for instance. In some specific instances
domain expertise can be helpful, but usually lack of domain expertise is
successfully mitigated by a developer forming a working relationship
with a non-technical domain expert. Personally, I don't see why this
model, which is applied in most organizations and most situations,
cannot be successfully applied in a library setting. 

In fact, I might go so far as to say that the MLIS in the hands of
someone who's experience is primarily as a technologist, may be as much
of a hindrance as a help. The fact is that they don't really teach you
that much in library school that maps to the day to day operations of a
library. The degree coursework generally involves a lot of information
theory and reading of scholarly literature. The reality is more about
maintaining regular operations and dealing with minutia of day to day
decision making. If I had walked into my current job without my
experience working with a diverse set of organizations (public, private,
small, medium, large), and the experience of sitting down with a person
who does something that I know nothing about, and then writing software
for them, I would be about as useful to my current employer as a brick.
If I had walked in with just the MLIS under my belt and some technical
knowledge, I would have made too many assumptions about my organization,
I wouldn't have asked enough questions, I wouldn't have engaged in
rigorous business analysis, and I certainly wouldn't have seen the
analogous nature of my library's operations with other organizations out
in the world that are <gasp> not libraries. 

I'm not saying the MLIS degree is bad, or that a library technologist
should think themselves unqualified for having the degree. What I am
saying is libraries are unique, but that uniqueness is not in itself
unique amongst the universe of organizations, and does not disqualify
libraries from the benefits of working with a skilled, non-MLS
technologist. MLS or no MLS, a successful technologist in a library must
fundamentally have business analysis skills. 

Currently in libraryland, I see a lot of excellent libraryish ideas
coming out non MLS technologists, and a lot of hogwash coming from MLS
technologists. I'm not saying that MLS necessarily equals hogwash in the
technology department, but what I will definitively say is that a lot of
the library technology pundants out there lack experience outside of
libraryland, and a lot of what I hear is proposed is done with a willful
ignorance of how the rest of the world approaches similar problems and a
broader perspective of current technology trends.

So, John, you get three big cheers from me for your CS degree, and your
experience outside of libraryland.

diversityOfExperience++
groupthink--

Sorry for the lengthy rant, everyone. This has been on my mind for a
while. Happy Thanksgiving to those of you in the US.

- David


---
David Cloutman <[log in to unmask]>
Electronic Services Librarian
Marin County Free Library 

-----Original Message-----
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
John Fereira
Sent: Saturday, November 22, 2008 2:22 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Looking for your thoughts on the future of
Libraries

<snip>

Over the past several weeks I've taken notice of the many job opening 
descriptions that have been posted here.  There have been many which 
describe positions which are essentially looking for developers of 
digital technologies but in many cases, the first requirement listed is 
a MLS, or basically is looking for a librarian with programming skills 
without consideration for a programmer (rarely do we see a degree in 
Computer Science in lieu of a MS) with library experience.

As you might have guessed, I fall into the latter category.  I've have 
been programming computers for over 25 years, working for a large 
computer manufacturer with a two letter acronym for 13 years, a stint at

a well known entertainment industry company, and for the past 12 working

  for a library.  Although the domain has changed, it's my skills as 
programmer/analyst/technology strategist that have led to my many 
contributions to the flood of digital technologies.

Perhaps the future of libraries is a recognition of those that don't 
have a MLS degree (or a degree at all, in my case) as valuable 
contributors to the success of a library.

Email Disclaimer: http://www.co.marin.ca.us/nav/misc/EmailDisclaimer.cfm

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTS.CLIR.ORG

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager