Conversation is definitely good. I didn't mean to dissuade anyone from
having it.

//Ed

On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Edward M. Corrado <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> I'm not making any rules. I want an open discussion of the pros and cons. No
> rules here.
>
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Jonathan Rochkind <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> Who's making rules?
>>
>> It's bad to discuss things without your peers before voting on them?  I
>> think it's a fine idea to discuss things before just blindly voting on them
>> without discussion.  Leads to better informed votes, does it not?
>>
>>
>>
>> Ed Summers wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Edward M. Corrado <[log in to unmask]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> I know there was a talk about a code4lib Europe in Portugal before. I'd
>>>> love
>>>> to see a European conference, but I am a little torn between making it a
>>>> separate conference from Code4lib or as a location to host for Code4lib.
>>>> What do people think?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> I think it's premature to worry about it, since there is no proposal
>>> on the table. And if there were a proposal on the table, why not just
>>> vote on it and not worry about making a rule about it?
>>>
>>> //Ed
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Jonathan Rochkind
>> Digital Services Software Engineer
>> The Sheridan Libraries
>> Johns Hopkins University
>> 410.516.8886 rochkind (at) jhu.edu
>>
>